Midterm Elections and Discussion of a Federal Renewable Portfolio Standard

a) Protect women’s reproductive rights, put honesty back into government, return power to the voters, and end tax-payer bailouts for the super-rich.
OR
b) Establish a federal renewable portfolio standard (RPS), even though it is fiercely opposed by the utilities who, in a deregulated environment have used their cozy relationships with the FERC-appointed quasi-governmental agencies to hide profits and create an environment in which only a fraction of clean energy is contracted for purchase at retail net metering rates, thus quietly but effectively removing incentive for capital formation in solar, wind, and other clean energy technologies.
If you picked b), I’d advise you to make another career choice.
Kidding aside, this is the exact situation in which we find ourselves at this point, which I explain on a post I just put up on Renewable Energy World called Mid-term Elections and Discussion of a Federal Renewable Portfolio Standard.

[…] the most visible proof of our nation’s abdication of technology leadership is the absence of a federal renewable energy portfolio standard (RPS). What are we to make of the fact that we seem to be a million miles from such a piece of […]