Clarence Thomas’s Blatant Criminality Is of Little if Any Concern

Economist Robert Reich says, “Clarence Thomas should not be allowed to rule on Trump cases after his wife was directly involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Recusal should be the absolute minimum. Your thoughts?”

Clarence Thomas has already demonstrated his utter contempt for this law; why are we expecting him to behave differently now?

Put another way, how many times does a high-ranking citizen of the United States have to break a law before he’s held accountable?

Thomas is thumbing his nose at an American rule of law.  Apparently, we don’t really care.