A Note on Science

This seems to be an idea that’s gotten lost in the shuffle of the last 400 years.
As Neil deGrasse Tyson likes to say, “What I like about science is that it’s true regardless of what you believe.”

This seems to be an idea that’s gotten lost in the shuffle of the last 400 years.
As Neil deGrasse Tyson likes to say, “What I like about science is that it’s true regardless of what you believe.”
There is only one problem with what being put forth here.
Since recorded time — the Laws of Physics dictated that “you can’t get more than you put in”, addressing “over-unity power production – until they did it themselves in 2022 and 2023.
Furthermore – their position didn’t take into account electric circuitry – that always reduce the input level below the output level — at “resonance” — where the circuit output never exceeds it’s maximum available output — except at resonance – when the required input level: is always reduced to less than the output.
This double standard – has put “us” in the place we are now in concerning Climate Change — even though we have had the Tesla based discovered and patented information on how to “electrically produce” (but not using a revolving generator) — all of the clean electricity we would ever need — for over 132 years.
And this double standard also falls squarely on your doorstep: – as you have had this information – but have chosen not to
“get it out into the public”.
Sorry, I don’t believe it, and, even if I did, I’m hardly the best-positioned blogger in the energy space to announce this to the world. Are these people part of a university? Have they published a paper?
Has it been peer-reviewed?