UK Conservatives Support of Progressive Environmental Policies

All this is true, but we’re using the word “conservative” in two vastly different senses. (more…)

All this is true, but we’re using the word “conservative” in two vastly different senses. (more…)

In my opinion, however, there has never been anyone who even remotely resembles British comedian and political activist Robert Newman. (more…)


I would only add in summary: smart people (and big corporations can afford to hire plenty of them) will always find a way to beat a certain tax, and especially a new one, where even the most obvious “end-runs” and unintended consequences have not been fully explored. (more…)

The episode that was published on April 27, 2015, entitled “Why Renewables Can’t Be Stopped,” began by covering the implications of the rebound in clean energy investment. In particular, after a two-year dip in global clean energy spending, the world saw a record $310 billion invested in solar, wind, storage and energy efficiency in 2014 (though this needs to double if we are to turn the corner on climate change by the year 2020). (more…)

This month I feature Doty WindFuels, a breakthrough in synthetic fuels, i.e., gasoline, diesel and jet fuel synthesized from point sources of CO2, the hydrogen from electrolyzed water, and off-peak wind energy. As I mention in the post, “If this gets the financial backing it deserves to make it happen, it’s going to happen big.”

Your argument is that we can extrapolate the incursion we’re making into coal linearly, and (more…)

He published many works under a variety of aliases… to disavow his own authority. He would adopt a “character” who wrote about a particular philosophical viewpoint, and then would adopt another persona to explore the opposing viewpoint.
I bring this up simply to note how incredibly rare it is to find this capacity for thought today, if it exists at all. (more…)


I thought I’d publish my response, because it speaks to a great number of clean energy business plans I see that present long discussions of the problem, i.e., environmental degradation in one form or another. This is unnecessary, and detracts from the quality of the piece by insulting the reader’s intelligence. Here I responded: (more…)