Plunging Oil Prices and Renewable Energy



McKibben said years ago that he doesn’t like public speaking. (more…)

If there is an answer (and I think there is), it’s that they will be paid handsomely in that rare event. A huge portion of our grid is built to address the peak load that is achieved less than 100 hours per (8760-hour) year. Shaving that peak with demand response or V2G has enormous value, which means that big bucks can be paid to whatever entities make it possible.
We also need to price in the value of ancillary services, i.e., small amounts of electrical energy that are used to address short-term perturbations in the grid’s wave form and voltage.

I hope we can agree Craig that the only long term solution is to have electrified transportation powered by renewable energy. I choose to be a part of that transition by having a BEV and PHEV and PV….I hear what you’re saying about coal usage. Coal-generated electricity is going away or humankind is going away, so I focus on the solution, which I would say is clearly PV. How can your title (“Fits and Starts”) describe the curve shown here (all plug-ins)?
Yes. We agree on the important stuff. (more…)


She loved to hear the different tongues, and especially loved listening to all the gossip, but when she first started writing poetry, she wrote in a formal, stilted British style because she thought that’s what poems were supposed to sound like. Then, in college, she met W.H. Auden and he agreed to read her work. She later recalled: “We went through a few (of my) poems, and he kept asking me, ‘Do you really talk like that?’ And that was the great thing I learned from Auden: you’d better talk your own language.”
This is probably the one concept on writing that means anything to me. In fact, I try to impart Auden’s advice to my children when I help them with their school papers, which I paraphrase: just use your voice. When they come up with some wordy, academic, hard-to-follow sentence to explain Wounded Knee or the reproductive cycle of sharks, I ask: If you and I were sitting down at dinner right now and you were trying to explain this to me, is that what you would say? The “voice” that you use to explain what you have in your mind is fine–just the way it is. In fact, it’s better than “fine,” it’s perfect.

Sorry, John. I hate to say it, but I think you’ve been hoodwinked. (more…)

Craig: Please (check out the concept for) Float Inc. marine technologies. As the various governments in the US have not seen fit to recognize the vast advantages of our marine technologies, we have managed to make forward strides here in Europe. I am currently corresponding with Ireland, Scotland, and the UK for possible advancements towards “getting the OFOES in the water” as Proof of Concept. Funding for this is very difficult to find, at this moment.
Wow, you’re not afraid of thinking big, are you? (more…)

Hi, and thanks very much for sharing this fascinating concept. As you can imagine, I come across many similar ideas in the course of a given year, even when I’m sitting back in my office. When I want a real deluge, I go to the Ocean Energy show, the most recent one of which was in Atlantic City (whose boardwalk–see photos above and below–features people dressed in unexpected ways).
Having watched your video (which, per your request, I won’t publish), I would say:

Given your line of work, you might want to be more politically aware in your statements. Instead of saying that you referred an investor to “the company that, by my wits, offers what I believe to be the most promising technology in …. (a certain space)”, you may want to say something like you referred that investor to “a company with a very promising technology.” If I made money helping to match investors with farmers who grow oranges, I would not publish a blog that said that I had recently referred an investor to the farm with the BEST oranges. (more…)