A Conversation on Hydrokinetics
Reader: Hi Craig. This is an interesting report from DOE stating that there are over 30,000 potential hydroelectric sites in the US where hydro power could be used with minimal environmental impact as there are already structures in place in the water flow. It goes on to say that using just the best 100 sites could amount to 8GW of renewable energy.
Sometimes there are easy solutions. I think baseload hydro should be used before covering our deserts with solar panels and our plains with wind turbines. Solar and wind are today’s sexy choices and get the most publicity, and poor old hydro and geothermal get the scraps from the table.
Craig: To me, the issue is scale. As you pointed out, there is a limit to run-of-river hydro. If you multiply the weight of all the water in all the rivers in the U.S. by the altitude from which it falls (i.e., all the potential energy), you’re under a terawatt, even if you got it all. 8 GW is about one-seventh of 1% of the 5.4 TW we’re consuming as we speak. I’m not saying we shouldn’t do it, but it’s not the answer we need. And btw, geothermal doesn’t seem to be making headway in terms of costs coming down and competing with solar, wind, and fossil fuels.
Reader: I guess you’re right. It seems it’s going to take a variety of solutions to get this thing done.
Craig: Yes. I don’t turn up my nose at hydro, but I don’t spend too much time on it either.