These folks ask: Curious about the decline in Christianity and church attendance? Support your congregation with learnings from this free 24-page study, including 10 practical ways to address these challenges in your community.
Of course, I have no idea what these “10 practical ways to address these challenges in your community” may be. Here are mine:
Take the very best of what Christ taught, e.g., the Beatitudes, and make it the core of the Christian message. Get rid of everything else. No threats of burning in hell. Nothing but kindness and compassion.
We don’t have access to the precise discussion between Kristi Noem and the editor she hired to prepare the South Dakota governor’s new book for publication. Yet it’s hard to imagine this happening too differently from the following:
Editor: Apparently, you shot a dog you couldn’t train for a certain specific purpose, instead of finding it a new home.
Noem: Correct.
Editor: To make such an entry in your book is to say that you’re not ashamed, perhaps even proud, of what you did.
Noem: Again, correct.
Editor: But many readers are going to infer that you’re a cold and empty human being, with no real compassion for other living beings. Are you sure you want to project yourself like that?
Noem: Absolutely. I suppose that, if this were some woke, sissy state, you’d have a point. But this is South Dakota, a state that went for Trump by a margin of almost two to one. These people have all the sentimentality of a freshly-sharpened chain saw.
Editor: But you’re a member of the Republican party, and the choices you make reflect on the entire GOP.
Noem: You apparently haven’t noticed that this is precisely what the party stands for at this point. We ban books, revoke women’s rights, align ourselves with world dictators, make groundless claims about a stolen election, make rich people richer and poor people poorer, and do everything possible to promote the consumption of fossil fuels. Our voters adoreus.
“Biden has weaponized the Justice Department against Trump” is a Fox News talking point that most Republicans accept without actually thinking about it.
Here, Robert Reich points out how glaringly incorrect it is.
• Trump lost the 2020 election, and, though there was no evidence of significant voter fraud, he continues to claim the election was rigged.
• He urged his supporters to storm the Capitol on January 6th to disrupt the confirmation of the election results, and then watched the insurrection on television for more than three hours before heeding the advice of his closest advisors and calling off the mayhem.
• Since then, more than 800 of the insurrectionists have been tried and sentenced.
• Trump says he’ll pardon these people if he’s re-elected in 2024.
• Here, he’s saying that violence post the 2024 election is an option “depending on the fairness of the election.”
• Trump got 71 million votes in 2020. If only 0.1% of them are armed and prepared to take to the streets in the event that Trump loses, that’s 71,000 morons with assault rifles, ready to do whatever Trump asks of them.
Given this, is there anyone who thinks there’s the slightest chance that this country will avoid widespread violence if Trump loses the election?
Now, here’s a possible scenario: Trump loses but tells his people that, although the 2020 election was rigged, this one was completely fair and honest. Does that seem likely? To anyone?
As Reich points out here, we live in horrible times in terms of abandoning rule of law.
Anyone who’s wondering what early 20th Century Germany and Italy were like leading up to the onset of fascism need only look around at the present-day United States.
When you consider Trump’s position on matters like those at left, you have to ask yourself: What percentage of Americans are turned on by hate and stupidity like this?
If anyone else wanted to become the first U.S. dictator, he would do it …..slowly…..and….quietly. Not Trump.
Maybe the generalissimo understands that only about 25% of American voters support fascist platforms like these but hopes that many more will cast their ballots for him because he’s not Biden. Who knows?
Modern science is religion. If you know what the scientific method entails and how the method is used, you will be able to call out the scammers. Since the 30s science has died. It is sad, what people call science now days. Science is a word that automatically adds credibility, while completely staying away from real science.
Thanks for this. I’ll try to remember to pass this along to my friends in the biologic and physical sciences, who represent a tiny fraction of the many millions of those who are working feverishly around the globe to make our lives longer, healthier, better informed, and more productive.
Sorry for the sarcasm, but I get this constantly, given that I interview climate scientists and report on their work. It never ceases to amaze me how people with no training in a subject are so harshly critical of our most distinguished intellects. This is what Arthur C. Clarke referred to as the American “cult of ignorance.”
a) It’s next to impossible to know whether or not 1970s rocker Alice Cooper actually said this. Today, it’s common for the MAGA crowd to fabricate stories about celebrities who are known to be kind and thoughtful people who, for instance, “refuse to work with Disney because the organization is ‘woke.'” Idiots believe this, and we live among them. It’s pathetic, but true.
b) Fortunately for us all, we Americans enjoy the protection of most (but not all) forms of speech under the First Amendment to our constitution. Yes, there are people who, erroneously, believe that Trump’s inciting the January 6th insurrection or lying about the honor of the judges presiding over his prosecution of the 88 felonies he is alleged to have committed are similarly protected.
But here, we have popular people who simply want to express their views. These people include billionaires, star athletes, actors, and musicians. If you have a problem with that, you really have no idea what First Amendment means.