From Guest Blogger Kristina Ross: So Hot Right Now (I think this is a reference to the weather, not the blogger, but I could be wrong. -Ed.)



There was never an “easy” time in human history, where civilization was on a kind of auto-pilot and the public welfare made progress on its own; the success of humankind as a wise, kind, and ultimately thriving species has always been in doubt. But the stakes are so much higher now than in any time in history, with the possibility of nuclear weapons in the hands of rogue states, the steady march of climate change and ocean acidification, the curtailment of civil liberties, and the dozens of other threats to our survival – all of which have greatly upped the ante.
I hope you’ll join me in urging people – especially young people — to get involved. Our civilization faces huge challenges, and they won’t take care of themselves.

I hope you’ll agree that with a modest budget, these people have told a story of amazing warmth, passion … and drama. (more…)

Maybe it’s time to reframe our utilities’ mission. When we had this conversation in the early 20th Century, we didn’t care where the power came from. Now we do. We didn’t need or want incentives to consume less electricity. Again, now we do. Let’s be wise enough to build those concerns into a new generation of laws by which our utilities are regulated — and the tensions will disappear instantly.

Linked below is a strange little article sent to me by frequent commenter Tim Kingston, who notes: “Thought this might interest you. The energy universe can be complex. Sometimes there no easy choices.” The article’s point is that the world of electricity without nuclear is, in a word, expensive.
Thanks, Tim. What you say is true: the world of energy requires us to make tough choices. But the concept that nuclear is inexpensive is completely erroneous.
The actual cost of building these plants is almost never anywhere near the projected budget. Readers may want to Google “nuclear plant cost overrun,” and read a few of the 312,000 articles they’ll find on the subject. Here’s one that refers to a certain nuclear project as “satanic,” based on the actual amount of the overrun ($6.66 billion). The Florida utility, FPL Group, now estimates the cost of building a new nuclear power plant at over $9 billion, nearly double their previous estimate.
We need to also keep in mind that the nuclear industry and its lobbies have carefully confused us about the costs of shipping and storing nuclear waste, which remains dangerous for as long as one million years.

Hybrid, electric or old car?
I recently contacted the Environmental Transport Agency who told me that: (more…)


Iban just left yesterday, returning to his home in Basque Country, after spending the summer here in the U.S. We’ll miss you.
Rebecca lives in Columbia, and is producing fantastic work.
Chelsea (pictured here) is on loan from the University of Central Florida. Go Knights!
Again, please accept my deepest thanks.

My current career in renewable energy has an important commonality, namely, that customer audiences still react to marketing messages if and only if those messages are aligned with their hot-buttons. And here’s a great example, from my colleague Jesse Berst of SmartGridNews writing about an initiative in Pennsylvania that would deploy smart meters to a customer base that may be skeptical of the cost/benefits: (more…)