From Guest Blogger SolarLighting: Can We Copy the solar success of NJ to the Other States of the US?


One of my reasons for coming back to Boston is to meeting various folks from the industry who happen to make this wonderful town their home. Today I bought a birthday lunch for industry colleague Kevin Gulley, publisher of GreenCollarEcomony.com, an enterprise that I’ve admired for some time. It’s always fun sharing observations.

First, let me say that I do not compare my writing — its quality nor its importance — to Kristof’s. But I do have to say that I smiled when he made that remark. I’m sure I haven’t changed anyone’s mind on the imperative to break our addiction to oil, the validity of global warming, etc. If I’ve done anything here, it’s to provide a forum for discussion — and I thank the many people who have been a part of that forum with their questions, their comments, and their guest blogs.

Alternative energy will become a reality; that’s not in question. The question is: who’s going to get rich in the process?
Here’s a fact: the people who made the last fortune in energy (1910 – 2010) want to make damn sure they’ll be the ones to do it again.
And here’s my prediction: Unless something unforeseen and incredibly dramatic happens, that’s precisely what’s going to happen. Here are some details, lest you think I’m one of these tawdry fortune-tellers who speaks in fortune-cookie generalities: (more…)
My friend Bruce Severance called last night and announced his availability to rejoin the ranks for those who are engineering tomorrow’s electric vehicles.
I can’t even begin to list this guy’s credentials – both in terms of formal training at one of Southern California’s leading design schools – as well as tons of industry experience. If anyone’s interested in hiring a top-notch thinker, engineer, and futurist – as well as a first-rate human being, please let me know and I’ll hook you up with Bruce.

Craig, surely there’s no doubt that you are right to a great degree. There are vested interests that stand to lose a lot of money by a transition away from fossil fuels. As Upton Sinclair said some 70 or 80 years ago, “It is extraordinarily difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it!” But are those established interests of the gods? No. I’m sure the makers of gas lamps tried to oppose Edison’s electric light.
Sir: This is all true. And no one needs to convince me that people of the time, e.g., the Rockefellers, were at least as powerful — and ruthless – as any forces around today. But did they have their tentacles so far into the fabric of Washington? And, perhaps more to the point, had the American people been lulled to sleep by a corporate-owned media empire that deliberately derails them from finding the truth?

To me, however, the issue is less academic. I think the overriding issue here is not Moore’s Law as it applies to the development of technology in a free, market-driven world that genuinely has an appetitite. Unless I’m quite wrong here, the migration to renewables will continue to be hamstrung by the forces that are far more powerful coming from big money and politics: subsidies, political favors, etc.
Why don’t we in the US have a federal energy policy that firmly takes us towards health, safety, and sustainability? Are we to suppose that this is an accident? No, there are enormously powerful forces behind our actions (or lack thereof) — forces that trump the natural tendencies that may exist within free markets.
Does this sound like an unfair accusation? Ask yourself: What’s the purpose of those 7000 lobbyists who work for the oil industry?

So how much appetite do we Americans have for cramped, cheap little cars that go 25 MPH? I’d say it’s just a hair’s breadth this side of zero. This enterprise will not succeed, but the only reason that it is even worthy of a conversation is the huge incentives that Mr. McAuliffe and his super-powerful buddies intend to ram through Congress. I.e., taxpayers will be forced once again to open up their wallets to make feasible a business that would have been laughed out of any corporate board room I’ve ever been in.
There is so much good that the public sector can – and must — do at this precious moment in time. But these actions must be disciplined, well-conceived, and free of undue influence. This example has none of these characteristics, and will justifiably raise the ire of an electorate that is already pretty fed-up with wasteful government spending.

a) Protect women’s reproductive rights, put honesty back into government, return power to the voters, and end tax-payer bailouts for the super-rich.
OR
b) Establish a federal renewable portfolio standard (RPS), even though it is fiercely opposed by the utilities who, in a deregulated environment have used their cozy relationships with the FERC-appointed quasi-governmental agencies to hide profits and create an environment in which only a fraction of clean energy is contracted for purchase at retail net metering rates, thus quietly but effectively removing incentive for capital formation in solar, wind, and other clean energy technologies.
If you picked b), I’d advise you to make another career choice.
Kidding aside, this is the exact situation in which we find ourselves at this point, which I explain on a post I just put up on Renewable Energy World called Mid-term Elections and Discussion of a Federal Renewable Portfolio Standard.
