This theme, that education is indoctrination and is actually harmful to our personhood, is extremely popular now, but largely among our nation’s uneducated people. This could be called “sour grapes,” but some (uneducated) people won’t know what this means.
We’re so screwed.
Supporting the idea that education kills our capacity for creativity and critical thinking has great appeal to many Americans as our society dwindles down into Trumpism, but what are the consequences? A few ideas include our American kids who:
Can’t tell you where Minnesota or France is, and can barely read and write.
Will never achieve any real wealth and will certainly never take any place in our knowledge-based world.
Will be fantastic candidates to support Trump, or, perhaps, the even greater bastard who comes next.
Ten years ago, if you had surveyed Americans as to the viability of selling off public lands to for-profit corporations, people would have laughed in your face. “That’s an outrageously stupid idea, as it strikes a blow to the core of who we are as a people,” you would have heard people say.
Now, just the blink of an eye later, it’s happening right in front of us.
I guess the word “outrageous” is relative. What was outrageous 10 years ago makes perfectly good sense today.
An American startup just unlocked hydropower from dry land — with no rivers or dams.
In a radical rethinking of water-based energy, an American startup has developed a closed-loop hydropower system that works without a natural river or dam. It uses gravity, elevation, and recycled water to generate continuous electricity — even in dry, landlocked regions.
This is called “pumped-storage hydroelectricity” or “pumped hydro,” and it’s been commercially available since the 1930s, at which point, I suppose, it could have been called “radical.” To this day, almost a century later, it represents the vast majority of energy storage on this planet.
The MAGA folks are thrilled that people living here with brown skin are terrified about what’s happening under Trump. But how sustainable is this? How long will it take until fatal gunshot wounds between the hunters and the hunted become too common to keep track of?
Moreover, is this what we want from our government?
I’m a straight, white 70-year-old Quaker school graduate (largely pacifist) who doesn’t own a gun. But what if this were a different situation, say, one in which I had reason to fear that my family and I could be kidnapped at gunpoint by armed and masked criminals?
Who, regardless of their political/religious philosophies, wouldn’t buy weapons (big ones) and use them to protect themselves and their families?
I keep thinking of what I would do if someone knocked on my front door and told me to come with him, especially before my wife and I became empty-nesters and I still had our kids to protect. If he couldn’t produce a warrant, I’d say, “One more step and I’m going to blow a hole in your chest the size of a cantaloupe.”
My reasoning: I could go to prison, but I doubt it. I’d love to meet the jury that’s going to convict me for defending my own life and that of my loved ones.
We have a choice to make here before this gets really ugly.
The story at left is a strange one, though worth telling for a good reason: We all should make sure that money plays its proper role in our lives.
One part of this tale rings particularly true: avoid displays of wealth. As I told my kids when they were growing up, “Unless you’re an extremely shallow person–and neither of you are–it does you absolutely no good to have other people believe you to be rich. You don’t want people trying to sell you stuff, borrowing money, or glomming on to you for impure reasons.
I would describe what Rousseau said about himself here as “gutsy.” Most of us don’t want paradoxes in our mental lives; such “cognitive dissonance” as it is called is an uncomfortable phenomenon.
Trump’s following of amoral rich people and uneducated whites seems to be remaining in place, because neither group actually cares too much about the veracity of what comes out of his mouth. The former group is getting tax breaks, and the latter group is getting mass deportation of non-whites.
Remember when Canada and the U.S. were best friends? Hockey jokes, Niagara Falls road trips, and snowbirds flooding Florida condo boards with drunk westerners getting arrested in VEGAS?
Yeah. That relationship’s gone.
Welcome to Canada’s unofficial, but very real, travel boycott of the United States—a not-so-silent protest against Donald Trump’s economic aggression, authoritarian rhetoric, and his laughable “Canada is the 51st state” delusion. And make no mistake: this boycott with a conscience is costing the U.S. billions, especially in border states that depend on seasonal Canadian tourism, real estate, and retail.
There is a reason that 90% of Canadians live within 60 miles of the United States. Or at least there was. Before this mass stupidity on Trump’s part, it was common for Canadians to spend an upscale vacation in our gentler climates and conduct trade in dozens of different industries.
Without doubt, a cleanly and frequently mowed lawn of some variety of grass was the paradigm for our front and back yards when we were young.
Many of us today, however, if we had it to do over again, would opt for something far friendlier to the environment, not to mention easier to maintain.