Park2Park – A Novel Concept in Sustainability

Great idea.

Great idea.

I would like to highlight Daniel Nocera and his breakthrough work:
Daniel Nocera, a chemist and Dreyfus Professor of Energy at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) also runs the SunCatalytix company. He and fellow Matthew Kanan discovered an inexpensive and easy way to store energy which could change energy around the world. In a nutshell, he developed a technology that splits water into hydrogen and oxygen to enable storage of solar and wind energy for 24-hour use. The idea is that when the sun isn’t shining (at night, rainy days), you will have already collected and stored the solar power. Nocera says energy stored in the size of a water bottle could power an average U.S. home. The technology could be groundbreaking for areas where there is no power or power grid (countryside, third world countries, islands) but could also allow typical households to power themselves.
This project received some funding from ARPA. Nocera thinks this process will bring solar mainstream, stating that we can’t hope to have a solar economy unless it can be produced 24/7. The discovery was made in mid 2008 and the team has been working at improving, testing and finding the right way for all to use. His goal is a robust system that is low maintenance.
“Solar power has always been a limited, far-off solution. Now we can seriously think about solar power as unlimited and soon,” he said in Science on July 31, 2008. He is confident and hopes that within 10 years
U.S. homeowners will be able to power their homes in daylight through solar photovoltaic cells and power their own household fuel cell at other times with the excess stored energy.
Nocera asks on the MIT website – what will be the oil of the future? He hopes it is as simple as water plus sun.
There are many more technological advances in the works in many places and exciting technologies seem to be bubbling up. Turning a bottle of water into energy storage for a home is just one example. These advances will help green tech advance to become more efficient and more financially viable.

Those of us who follow the renewable energy world focus on the market applications of solar, wind, hydro and biomass — the politics and financial issues – and the statistics on what is being installed. But here, in a lesser-known world of R&D. scientists and researchers are working tirelessly on the next great discovery that could change the entire landscape. It’s a fascinating world – and one that is ramping up fast.
Science Will Move Renewable Energy Forward
ARPA-E, or Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy is a fairly recent US government agency, established to drive R&D within the energy sector, and was formed in response to the U.S. losing its tech lead. The director, Arun Majumdar, said “We have a Sputnik moment right now. We are losing our technology leadership and we are falling behind. Our role is to take the high-risk, high-payoff approach to developing technologies… Business as usual and the pace of innovation is just not fast enough.” (Scientific American podcast. “Seeking Transformational Energy Technologies”, by David Biello. March 2010).
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and a host of university researchers here and abroad are also busy on clean tech — and so are corporations. The National Energy Research Lab (NERL) plays a part, too. Some of the research comes from stimulus funding or separate ARPA-E funding, while some funding is from private sources and venture funds.
Just a few recent discoveries and innovative work in solar, wind and biomass include:
More on this tomorrow.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_V9vAu4oqI0&w=445&h=364]
Craig Shields, former Libertarian, speaks on the role of government should play in energy policy, citing the need for a level playing field for renewable energy.

Steven Chu, Secretary of the US Department of Energy (DOE) claims, “Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles could revolutionize personal transportation and cut our dependence on foreign oil, not to mention give us cleaner air and less carbon pollution.” (more…)
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMAuCBfz9tM&w=445&h=364]
On behalf of 2GreenEnergy, Craig Shields speaks on the Energy Industry, and the changes in perspective that are required if we’re to have a sustainable energy policy.

The problem IS the money. As long as your solution involves selling and buying something, then you are dependent on the System of systems and centralized currency. Ask yourself if your ‘green’ solution can be implemented locally with local materials and without money from outside interests. If not, it isn’t truly sustainable, it’s just Marketing. Marketing is a religion, fostered by belief in perpetual growth and owned by centralized authority.
It’s certainly true that we’re trained to be super-consumers. As always, Dan makes some excellent points about the underlying nature of the problem we’re all trying to solve. But two things:
1) I’m not so sure that the world would be a better place with seven billion Henry David Thoreaus living solitary, introspective, and misanthropic lives in crude huts.
2) Even if that simplicity would, in fact, be better, it seems quite impossible to turn back the clock and try to get there. From the end of World War II coming forward, Western Culture has aggressively taught us that we’re pathetic losers if we don’t have the right hair, the right car, vacation in the right countries, and, if we’re guys, sleep with women who look like Scarlett Johansson. It’s asinine, and it’s unsustainable, but it seems to sum up human civilization right now.

In short, what everyone thought was dead, at least for this year, now seems very much alive. With healthcare out of the way, climate change legislation (which they’ll probably call energy legislation) should become the new buzz in Washington. On Wall Street, everyone’s going to wonder how this will affect different companies and industries, which is where we come in.
Separately, take a look at this recent Reuters story, specifically in the 3rd paragraph the mention of growing “institutional interest” in alternative energy. This too is good news.
I notice – with no particular level of surprise – that many of the comments we get on business blog posts suggest fairly radical ideas in terms of social reform. I am by no means an expert on this, though I do try to keep an open mind to ideas other than garden-variety capitalism.
In fact, I often ask myself: What would have happened in Cuba over the past 50 years if the US hadn’t done everything in its power to ensure the most miserable lives possible for those people? Are there valid alternatives to our way of life?
But, looking at these ideas in a cold and pragmatic light, it seems that these alternative social and economic construct only replace one set of horrors with another – in many case, horrors that are far greater. If market conditions do not set levels of production and consumption of goods and services, who or what does? Can anyone reasonably believe that a centralized government will do a better job than free-market capitalism?

Another Example of Foreign Investment
Danish company Vestas, world wind turbine leader, has been expanding its production base in the U.S. where it says it created more than 1,200 skilled jobs, and expects that number to climb to 4,000 or more by the end of 2010. Vestas was encouraged by the Obama administration’s commitment to develop renewable energy; they say it hopes Congress will pass a national renewable energy standard to stabilize the U.S. market in the long term.
This key point, much discussed and highlighted lately, needs to be understood. The renewable markets, including wind, have been relatively unstable because tax credits and other policies are short-term and lapse with no assurance of continued support. Further, there is no policy enabled by a Renewable Electricity Standard, ensuring purchase of renewable energy by utilities.
Where China provides the wind industry assurance of growth with a $440 – $660 billion clean energy bill and requirement to buy renewable energy generated power, there is no corollary in the US
Europe is the undisputed leader in wind energy. 60% of world capacity was installed in Europe by the end of 2007, says the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA. “Wind Energy – The Facts”, February 2009) — and political support continues for growth. The European Union adopted a 20% renewable target by 2020 and followed with legislation in 2008 to support expansion. EWEA projects 80,000 MW installed by end of 2020. Denmark has already reached 21% of electricity supplied by renewables, and Spain sits at about 12%. The following chart, courtesy of the Energy Information Agency, illustrates the place that wind holds for electricity generation in Europe:
Underlying key factors in supporting U.S. legislation and policies for the renewable energy industry include:
job growth and economic opportunities abound;
clean energy is good for the environment and our health;
renewables are necessary long-term to wean us away from foreign dependence on fossil fuels
Key legislation, policies and credits are key factors for any country – the U.S or foreign – to invest. While The American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan (known as the stimulus funding) is a great boon to the new industries, it too is temporary and expires in 2012. Support will be needed from every quarter to continue the growth.