Disgusting. It’s one thing that “news” in the United States has largely been replaced by incendiary opinions. But it’s even worse that so many of these opinions are so grossly ill-informed.
In its quest to move to the middle of the political spectrum, CNN has integrated a few hard-right commentators, like Jennings. Fine; I get that. But do they have to be morons?
In particular, can’t CNN do better than to refer to California as a “failed state?” If California were a nation it would be the fourth largest economy on the planet, having recently overtaken Japan.
The answer to Dr. Goodall seems to be that intelligence is only one of the characteristics that makes humankind unique on this planet. Into the soup, we need to add extra ingredients: especially greed and cruelty.
From there, we can sprinkle on a bit of cognitive bias. We like to think we’re completely rational agents, but that’s far from the truth.
In the note at left Robert Reich reminds us that Trump’s supporters must be under great emotional stress to take this man seriously. Every day brings us new adventures in complete insanity.
As we all learned in Psych 101, cognitive dissonance is the uncomfortable phenomenon that occurs when a person holds two contradictory beliefs at the same time. Unless you have the intelligence of a jellyfish, you cannot simultaneously believe a) that Donald Trump is an honorable man who is making America great again, and b) that he is actively obstructing justice by pardoning his supporters for the crimes of which they have been convicted.
The reader who sent me this asked if found what Macgregor wrote here to be offensive.
Let me preface my response: I clearly remember Douglas Macgregor from my K-12 education at the William Penn Charter School in Philadelphia, even though he was several years my senior. Even as a boy, I was impressed with his intellect and eloquence, though I was surprised that he was so outspoken about his ultra-conservative beliefs, and had such a great enthusiasm for war, especially considering that “PC” is a Quaker school, built around a religious philosophy centered on pacifism.
As anyone could have predicted, Macgregor went on to a stratospheric career in the U.S. military, and is a former government official, author, consultant, and political commentator.
To answer the question, I do indeed find what he wrote here to be offensive, though perhaps stupid is a better descriptor. The idea that people of my age have minds that can’t be accessed with the truth is preposterous, and yes, deeply insulting.
What he means by all of this, of course, is that most boomers, who experienced the cultural reformation of the 1960s and who, in general, enjoyed better educations than young Americans today, tend to have liberal values that he finds, and has always found, abhorrent.
From “Occupy Democrats”: Democratic Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (pictured) crushes MAGA Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for whining about the Biden administration instead of planning for the future: “We have zip! Nada!”
“The challenge is our department under the previous administration squandered a lot of that—” said Hegseth during a hearing in front of the House Defense Appropriations subcommittee.
“Please, I want your plan!” interjected DeLauro. “I’ve had difficulty with the prior administration and I don’t mind calling them out. What is your plan for the future!? Can we get that in writing and on paper so that we know where you’re going?”
Well, the Trump administration is loath to admit it, but the plan is in writing, and it’s embodied in the 900-page document “Project 2025.” It’s an amalgam of tax cuts for the rich, the dismantling of the federal government, the end of regulations on corporate polluters, consolidation of power into the executive branch, the elimination DEI in government (and, if possible, in the private sector as well), and the abolition of rights for women and minorities like LGBTQs, Muslims, etc.
If one were to rank each of the American presidents from first to last in terms of respect for our troops, I suppose that Washington, Lincoln, or Eisenhower would be at the top. Trump would most certainly be last, and that would have been true even before the latest debacle in Los Angeles.
There are categories, however, where Trump scores very well, e.g., lawlessness and cruelty.