From Guest Blogger Lillian Connor – Sustainable Luxury: Strategies Redefining High-End Fashion



Of course, I have no idea what these “10 practical ways to address these challenges in your community” may be. Here are mine:
Take the very best of what Christ taught, e.g., the Beatitudes, and make it the core of the Christian message. Get rid of everything else. No threats of burning in hell. Nothing but kindness and compassion.

Editor: Apparently, you shot a dog you couldn’t train for a certain specific purpose, instead of finding it a new home.
Noem: Correct.
Editor: To make such an entry in your book is to say that you’re not ashamed, perhaps even proud, of what you did.
Noem: Again, correct.
Editor: But many readers are going to infer that you’re a cold and empty human being, with no real compassion for other living beings. Are you sure you want to project yourself like that?
Noem: Absolutely. I suppose that, if this were some woke, sissy state, you’d have a point. But this is South Dakota, a state that went for Trump by a margin of almost two to one. These people have all the sentimentality of a freshly-sharpened chain saw.
Editor: But you’re a member of the Republican party, and the choices you make reflect on the entire GOP.
Noem: You apparently haven’t noticed that this is precisely what the party stands for at this point. We ban books, revoke women’s rights, align ourselves with world dictators, make groundless claims about a stolen election, make rich people richer and poor people poorer, and do everything possible to promote the consumption of fossil fuels. Our voters adore us.
Editor: Fair point.

Here, Robert Reich points out how glaringly incorrect it is.

• Trump lost the 2020 election, and, though there was no evidence of significant voter fraud, he continues to claim the election was rigged.
• He urged his supporters to storm the Capitol on January 6th to disrupt the confirmation of the election results, and then watched the insurrection on television for more than three hours before heeding the advice of his closest advisors and calling off the mayhem.
• Since then, more than 800 of the insurrectionists have been tried and sentenced.
• Trump says he’ll pardon these people if he’s re-elected in 2024.
• Here, he’s saying that violence post the 2024 election is an option “depending on the fairness of the election.”
• Trump got 71 million votes in 2020. If only 0.1% of them are armed and prepared to take to the streets in the event that Trump loses, that’s 71,000 morons with assault rifles, ready to do whatever Trump asks of them.
Given this, is there anyone who thinks there’s the slightest chance that this country will avoid widespread violence if Trump loses the election?
Now, here’s a possible scenario: Trump loses but tells his people that, although the 2020 election was rigged, this one was completely fair and honest. Does that seem likely? To anyone?

Anyone who’s wondering what early 20th Century Germany and Italy were like leading up to the onset of fascism need only look around at the present-day United States.

I could ask any kid in the local high school what the American Revolution was about, and get correct answers like:
“We didn’t want a king. We wanted to elect someone who is accountable to the law and to the people.”

If anyone else wanted to become the first U.S. dictator, he would do it …..slowly…..and….quietly. Not Trump.
Maybe the generalissimo understands that only about 25% of American voters support fascist platforms like these but hopes that many more will cast their ballots for him because he’s not Biden. Who knows?
This is a monumental fail. Thank God.

Modern science is religion. If you know what the scientific method entails and how the method is used, you will be able to call out the scammers. Since the 30s science has died. It is sad, what people call science now days. Science is a word that automatically adds credibility, while completely staying away from real science.
Thanks for this. I’ll try to remember to pass this along to my friends in the biologic and physical sciences, who represent a tiny fraction of the many millions of those who are working feverishly around the globe to make our lives longer, healthier, better informed, and more productive.
Sorry for the sarcasm, but I get this constantly, given that I interview climate scientists and report on their work. It never ceases to amaze me how people with no training in a subject are so harshly critical of our most distinguished intellects. This is what Arthur C. Clarke referred to as the American “cult of ignorance.”

I’ve been too quick to point out the stupidity of other people in my life, but what have I accomplished?
I’ve been criticized for my mediocre talents at the piano, but, now that I’ve quit, did anyone win that war?
Maybe it’s best to celebrate the goodness in others, and keep one’s criticism to oneself.