Thanks to Trump, Putin’s Riding High

Where he would be without Trump’s support is anyone’s guess.

Where he would be without Trump’s support is anyone’s guess.

You’re essentially a crackpot if:
You have no scientific training, and you’re questioning the findings of scientists in their respective fields of expertise.
You believe that the 2020 presidential election was rigged against Trump, despite the fact that 60+ courts found no evidence for this whatsoever.
Here’s what I wonder about: Who is this semi-naked woman, and what kind of racket sport is she playing?

Southeast Asians, as we all know, are more inclined towards math and science, which is why we see their surnames all over our hospital placards.
Americans are lucky if they can find Poland on a map of the world.
So, why this cataclysmic failure? I suspect that it’s a combination of factors, mostly rooted in U.S. politics. Americans have very little patience for solutions to problems that take years or even decades to play themselves out. If a certain politician advocates for something that doesn’t show immediate benefits, he’s a failure, and that now becomes ammunition for his opponent in the next election.
This is all coupled by the fact, that, at a certain level, we simply don’t care. If you disbelieve that, ask yourself why we pay our teachers so poorly, and why we allow charter schools to siphon the cream off the top of the student population.

It begins:
A Glass-Half-Full Look at the Gargantuan Carbon Footprint of Making Stuff
Every year, America gets through roughly 700 pounds of cement, nearly as much steel, 300 pounds of plastic and 25 pounds of aluminum per person. Providing the raw materials of modern life with far less emissions is starting to look tantalizingly possible, but the making-stuff business remains a laggard in its response to climate change.
“Making less stuff” is akin to morphing away from our consumer society, and it’s refreshing to see the WSJ talk about that, even obliquely.
IMO, what we are seeing here is the WSJ’s trying to position itself as dead-on “centrist” in their journalism. This is distinctly more to the left from their earlier conservative leaning; it would have been fanciful to think of anything associated with climate change even a few years ago.

Would war have become the default mechanism for settling disagreements between nations? To what extent would there be nations at all, meaning tribal groups that generally act as competitors, rivals, even enemies?
How likely does it seem that a woman would rise to a position of absolute power, and use it to oppress millions of people, like a Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Xi, Kim Jong Un, Putin, or Trump (if he gets his way).
Sadly, it appears that we’ll never know how this could have turned out. In fact, here in the United States, and in several countries around the globe, things are going in the opposite direction.

Their bountiful renewable resources (mostly wind) and their capacity to sell excess energy to neighboring Germany also come down in their favor.

The highest GDP growth in the G7, low unemployment, record stock market returns, inflation in control, all look pretty rosy to me.