Whenever We See an Artist’s Rendering, Rather than a Photograph of a Working Prototype, We Need to Wonder

The concentration of CO2 in our atmosphere is fairly consistent from the planet’s surface up to about 60 miles in elevation.
Given that the radius of the Earth is ~4000 miles, and that the volume of a sphere is 4/3 πr3, this means the volume of this section of our atmosphere is 4/3 π 40603 – 4/3 π 40003 = 11.7 trillion cubic miles.
How many of these devices will be required to make a significant dent in the overall CO2 concentration, given that they need to process almost 12 trillion cubic miles of our atmosphere? What’s the cost per each one? How will they be powered, given that our grid-mix is largely fossil fuels? Won’t this only make matters worse?
This is a sad joke, but even sadder, it’s not the only one out there.

I’m sorry to report that “the Donald Trump of Argentina” Javier Milei has won his country’s presidential election.
Here’s an 
Fistfights at sporting events erupt spontaneously–even in the absence of provocative statements like the one this fellow is making.
These people’s message to potential investors: “There is no reason to drill when you can capture CO2 directly from the air.”
I don’t think anyone of any political philosophy disputes that the United States is in trouble.
Here we have the words of Monica Crowley, political commentator, lobbyist, and Fox News contributor.
MIT linguistics professor emeritus Noam Chomsky belongs in the same class as Bertrand Russell: a small group of extremely intelligent people whose contribution to society is a blend of a penetrating understanding of the world, married with a profoundly humanistic philosophy.
Really?