
My guess is that Tucker Swanson Carlson would be selling time-shares or chasing ambulances had he not been born a trust-fund baby into this amazing empire of wealth.

Her most memorable commercial: “When my children come home from school and want a snack, I say, ‘Fine, but it has to be Hostess.'”
The implication is that Hostess foods were more nutritious than other snacks on the market at the time, but can anyone possibly name one? The Twinkie is almost as close to pure sugar as you’re going to get without opening a few packets and pouring them directly down your kids’ throats.
We’re looking at the power of a celebrity endorsement, regardless of how insincere it may be.

COVID is gone (at least for now) because enough people acquired a sufficient degree of immunity to the disease, either through vaccinations or through contracting it and living through it, rendering it incapable of spreading any further.
The fictional hardhat in the cartoon here both a) dodged a bullet, and b) prolonged the disease and its impact on our civilization.

Imagine, if you can, hundreds of millions of untrained pilots flooding our skies, flying cheap, shoddy junk. Imagine further that the FAA has no issue with bits of drone pieces and body parts falling like rain onto the ground.
My advice: Jump on in. These are obviously intelligent and honest people, right?

That was before corporate greed took over virtually every aspect of our daily lives.
Today, corporate profits are at an all-time high, and what are these behemoths doing? Lowering costs, especially that of human capital, while raising prices.


Brilliant chemist Primo Levi takes the view of many holocaust survivors, i.e., that the danger lies more in the enablers than the “monster” himself.
In Trump’s case, the “enablers” include not only his inner circle and supporters in Congress, but the right-wing news media. If Fox News, for instance, only had a shred of decency, and refused to promote this sociopath, the entirety of American society wouldn’t gone down this deadly path.
2GreenEnergy supporter Gary Tulie writes as follows:
So, are his actions here unethical? Believe it or not, I wouldn’t say so.
Trump’s base understands that the former president uses their donations to forward his political career and return to the White House as quickly as possible. In my estimation, he’s keeping his end of the agreement, since he knows that serving a life term in prison will make it quite difficult for him to fulfill the duties of the 46th U.S. president.
Now, if you’re Steven Bannon and you solicited donations to complete the wall on the southern border, only to put those funds into your pocket, you’ve crossed a big fat line from potentially “unethical” to “blatantly criminally fraudulent.”
Going back to Trump, we’re really wasting our breath if we’re talking about borderline unethical acts when we’re talking about a man charged with 91 felonies, including his attempt to overthrow the United States government. Discussion on this issue is equivalent to calling him out on his makeup or his hiring a prostitute.