Why Don’t We Have Solar-Powered Cars?

When the sun is high in the sky on a sunny day, each square meter of the Earth’s surface below receives about 1000 Watts (1 kiloWatt) of power. Suppose there are three square meters of solar PV on the car shown here, so that’s 3 kWs. If the solar panels are 30% efficient, that’s 900 Watts, a little over 1 horsepower, not even enough to filter a good-sized swimming pool.
Now, obviously, if the car has a big battery pack, you can leave it charging for a long period of time. But even cheap little cars have 100-hp+ motors so they can achieve freeway speeds and get up hills.
Let’s suppose that, because of its sleek design, you can get away with 50 hp. You’ll be charging it (in full sun) 50 times longer than you’ll be driving it.

The sentiment expressed at left makes sense to many of us, but, upon reflection, it comes from two completely disparate camps: the opposite ends of the IQ bell curve.
A reader notes: Many of the Christians in the USA think Jesus’s return is not far off, thus a huge disincentive for long term sustainability.
Here’s what auto enthusiast
Here’s a faux advertisement for Chevron. It’s not unlike “Exxon Hates Your Kids,” but it’s longer and better.
Here’s a fabulous episode of the widely syndicated radio show Fresh Air, featuring
Here, author and neuroscientist Sam Harris explains why it’s useless to argue with the MAGA crowd.
I believe this was true when Bertrand Russell said it in 1926, in his lecture that was later transcribed into the essay “Why I Am Not a Christian.” It’s certainly less so today, given the statements and actions of Pope Francis.
From Clint Eastwood: People say that we must leave a better planet to our children. The truth is that we must leave better children to our planet.
FWIW, I side with the existentialists on this matter. I.e., I hold that there is no purpose or meaning to our lives other than that which we convey onto it.