How We’re Responding to Trump’s Criminal Insanity

They refuse to legitimize Trump with their presence.

They refuse to legitimize Trump with their presence.


It reminds me of something neuroscientist Sam Harris said: Religion is to the human mind what a virus is to a computer.

With each passing year, the problem is getting worse. In 2010, the American people at least had the intelligence to be outraged that Big Money owned our congress.
Now, we’ve elected Donald Trump twice, and each day brings a new slap across the face, a new demonstration that he believes we are powerless to remove him.

They don’t want a bunch of other things that people care about on the west coast and the northeast, e.g., honesty and the application of science to problem solving.
Give them white power and evangelical Christianity, and they elect you king.

And remarkably, about 35% of Americans still cannot put two and two together.
Kennedy has precisely two relevant characteristics: a) he’s an anti-science crackpot, and b) he’s intensely loyal to Trump.

About half of Americans in our last election, however, use a completely different criterion. They elect the person who will punish everyone but white male Christians.


I get called out by farmers for using the word “sustainability” because nature is dynamic and doesn’t hold to a level. The word they prefer is “regenerative” as it is closer to the complex system of nature and its energy exchanges. I don’t have an argument for or against it.
I don’t think I’ve ever run across enmity to the word “sustainability,” which is strange, because I’ve been at this for 17 years, and I’ve incurred the wrath of an uncountable number of people, especially climate deniers. I laughed out loud when a caller into a radio show on which I was being interviewed called me a “cockroach.”
I would say that “sustainable” and “regenerative,” while certainly not mutually exclusive, are actually two different things.
There are dozens of different ways to define “sustainability,” but the one I use is: “A society’s meeting its needs without making it impossible for future generations to meet theirs.” From the perspective of farming, normally this is called “sustainable agriculture,” but calling it “regenerative” works just fine for me, and adds more depth of understanding.