How To Respond To a Meaningless Statement
I took a course on the philosophy of science during my freshman year in college. The professor, whom I adored, told us this story:
A swami in India had the following conversation with a student:
Student: What keeps the Earth from falling to the bottom of the universe?
Swami: It rests atop an elephant.
Student: OK, but what does the elephant rest on?
Swami: A giant turtle.
Student: I see, but what does the turtle rest on?
Swami: Oh, it’s turtles all the way to the bottom.
Our professor suggested that, whenever we come across a statement that has no meaning, we say, “Turtles!”
That’s how I respond to Clarence Thomas’ quote above. Can anyone suggest a possible interpretation that adds any workable insight into the plight in which the United States finds itself?
I would wager that virtually all these altercations come from arguments over masks. This can be eliminated by making this statement: “When you bought your ticket for this flight, you agreed to abide by this airline’s mask policy. At this point, anyone who refuses to wear a mask will be arrested and charged with assault. If it happens before we leave the gate, you’ll be escorted off the flight by police. If it happens after we’ve left the gate, you’ll be arrested at our destination.”
What Noam Chomsky says here is, of course, true. It’s a broader, more generalized statement than what we say when we talk about the externalities of the fossil fuel world. They keep the profits, we all pay the price of cleaning up after them.
The anti-vaxxers really are taking themselves out.
A reader sent me the photo here, noting: A very rare occurrence, the sun and the moon are visible at the same time in the horizon. This phenomenon is known as Selenelion. 
The “Arizona Audit” found that the accuracy of the count was 99.98%. Can’t this be the end to this bull****?
IMO, there is no reason to believe that DeSantis is mentally ill. He’s simply aiming himself for success in the sad state of current-day Republican politics, based as it is on anti-vax, anti-science, and citizens’ right to do as they please with respect to COVID.
Scientism is “an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities).”
I got this from a reader who functions as a sales manager at a real estate agency, after graduating with a degree in liberal arts.
A reader sent me this meme, which is typical of the twisting the truth we see so often. The implication here is that removing the restrictions caused the infection rates to decrease, which is simply untrue. From 
