Peak Oil

For those trying to make sense of the concept of “peak oil,” i.e., the point at which the world capacity to extract oil from the Earth will have peaked, I’ve linked what I believe to be a good article.

Virtually no one doubts the basic concept. But how soon in our future (or how recently in our past) does that point lie? And what are its consequences?

A few weeks ago, a fine — and well-read friend told me over breakfast in New York, “Did you know that there’s enough oil under South Dakota to last 200 years?”

“That’s amazing,” I replied. “Then what’s all the fuss about?”

“Damn environmentalists.”

I’m not sure it’s that easy. The truth, which he, as an educated man should have known, is that we truly have exhausted the supply of easy-to-find oil, but that there is a huge deposit of shale/tar sands oil, whose economic and environmental costs of extraction are extreme.

Is there more oil? Yes. Does that provide us an easy answer? Not in the least.

Tagged with: , , , ,
2 comments on “Peak Oil
  1. Edouard says:

    I don’t even think it provides us an answer at all. Shale oil and gas are the best way to frack huge amounts of water and soil. This would take place in a world where water scarcity is increasing.

    France banned fracking a few weeks ago, and I am proud and happy they took the decision. cf. http://fwd4.me/05zg for more.

    In my view, we should do our best to conserve energy and push low carbon alternatives…

  2. piero lavo says:

    From New Zealand comes this article on our dalliance with fracking and a good summary of concerns for this practice around the globe- including the potential seismic issue: http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/lifestyle/mainlander/5329999/Fracking-yes-or-no