Is There Justice?

This has some interesting ramifications in the world of philosophy. Some people, for example, believe in an afterlife because they feel certain that good must triumph over evil, that justice must prevail, and if it doesn’t in this lifetime, there has to be a later opportunity for redress. Logician, mathematician and philosopher Bertrand Russell had fun with this. He said something like, “If you received a case of oranges from your aunt who lives across the sea, and when you opened it you found the ones on the top were rotten, would you think, ‘Well, the ones on the bottom must be ripe and juicy so as to offset the bad ones?'”
Having said this, I’ve recently started to question this basic unfairness thing. Maybe it’s a coincidence, but there seems to be a string of events in the news that suggest that bad things are starting to happen to bad people. Above is pictured Frank Nucera, a former New Jersey police chief, who called Donald Trump the “last hope for white people,” and used racial slurs hours after allegedly using excessive force on a handcuffed black man. He was found guilty in federal court of lying to the FBI, awaits verdicts on other charges, and will certainly be headed off to prison.
Maybe it’s not metaphysical; perhaps it’s much simpler. People of bad moral character tend to commit crimes. Some of them get caught, go through the justice system which sometimes works fairly, and get sent away.
If this is true, hold onto your hats; some pretty big (but terrible) people are going to be going down hard.

Craig,
Ah, there’s the puritan in you rearing its sharp pointed nose !
How eager are you to gloat at the thought of those you disagree with getting their comeuppance, especially those who dared fly too high…
But you do raise and interesting legal issue.
The charge of “lying to the FBI” seems a dangerous concept. The charge is easily abused by an overzealous, biased or corrupt government agency for political or other improper purpose.
Should simply “lying” or withholding incriminating information in itself be a crime ? Especially when no other charges are laid. Often there maybe no underlying “crime” able to be proven.
Having never met Frank Nucera, nor attended his trail, I have no personal experience of his guilt or innocence.
It’s interesting the jury couldn’t agree on the charges of “hate-crime, assault and deprivation of civil rights” , but guilty of making a misleading statement to the FBI.
Why didn’t Frank Nucera invoke his fifth amendment rights ? Here again is an instance where FBI can pressure a suspect into giving up those rights by threatening his livelihood and even pension rights for his family.
(the police chief was obliged to cooperate with the FBI or his dismissed and his pension stopped, the FBI also threatened member of his family ).
Unlike you, I can’t find any law where just being an admirer of the President make Frank Nucera guilty !
From my reading of the case, ex-police chief Frank Nucera seems to be a very unpleasant character who should have been removed from office years ago.
But does that justify the increasing use of such a very dubious law?