The Rapid Migration to Renewable Energy Is Happening Right In Front of Our Eyes



As it’s expressed, it’s an opinion with which no sane person can disagree. “Extremism” is by definition a bad thing, as it denotes hysteria and irrationality. Conversely, “pragmatism” is by definition a good thing, as it implies a calm level-headedness.
But personally, I don’t think being terrified of the consequences of modern human behavior on this planet is at all irrational. You obviously disagree. That’s fine; needless to say, not everyone agrees with me. (Pictured: William James, father of the philosophy of pragmatism–one of my heroes as a young man.)
Re: my post pointing out that 10,883 out of 10,885 peer-reviewed scientific studies in 2013 concluded that global warming is real and caused by humans, frequent commenter MarcoPolo writes: I’m sure it’s not your intention, but what you are suggesting would censor, or deter all debate, whether scientific or political.
I don’t resent climate scientists’ exploring this issue and trying to disprove the theory; that’s the way that all science is advanced. I’m no more in favor of doggedly holding on to a broken theory re: the climate than I am to a broken theory about the cause or treatment of cancer. I do, however, resent people who know nothing about the subject, e.g., the climate deniers in the U.S. Congress, shills for the oil companies, disseminating gibberish that has the effect of blocking progress to solutions to a problem that has the potential to cause mass extinction on the planet.
As a person of conscience, you should hold the same resentment.

Below are the calcs that the reader provides on the subject. My only comments are:
• Indeed, there are horrific consequences if the volume of water in Lake Mead falls to the point that Hoover Dam needs to be shuttered. However,
• Huge PV installations are not equivalent in value to hydroelectric facilities that offer dispatchable power, and
• Huge PV installations that are far from population centers pose additional challenges.
He writes: Thanks, Craig. Looking at Gary’s article, I realized I had seen it when it came out. Probably that’s what triggered my thinking this time. (more…)

On a more serious note, (more…)

It’s possible, though I’m not sure how feasible. My friend Gary Tulie of scenic Buckinghamshire England (pictured) knows more about this than I do, as proven in his excellent article: Saving the Salton Sea with Solar Arrays.
.

We’re starting to view all this as a holistic problem, examining the interplay between fossil fuel consumption, consumerism, climate change, the quantity and quality of food and water, human health, international hostility, the loss of biodiversity, and so forth. (more…)

Well, if I were trying to answer the market demand question, I would walk around a sample neighborhood with a clipboard and my cell phone, asking permission to survey people. To those who assented, I would show a shortened version of your video, and then ask:
If you do that as few as 20 times, you’ll learn an inestimable amount about the receptivity of the market.

Needless to say, I’m thrilled to see all this attention flowing into the e-bike space, as there are so many good things it accomplishes simultaneously. Not only does it reduce car and light-truck VMT (vehicle miles traveled), but it gets a ton of people out there bicycling who wouldn’t have considered it before. (more…)