Pete Hegseth to the Rescue?

Who in the hell is stupid enough to believe that the fitness standards to which our soldiers are held are inadequate and an alcoholic Fox News commentator has arrived to save the day?
Jesus.

Who in the hell is stupid enough to believe that the fitness standards to which our soldiers are held are inadequate and an alcoholic Fox News commentator has arrived to save the day?
Jesus.

I’m not sure what they believe in, but this is for certain: none of them thinks that an unscreened and potential criminal psychopath has an absolute right to buy and use a weapon of war so powerful that its only purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest possible period of time, making it perfect to take out whole schoolrooms of children.

He co-founded a company that partnered with IBM to provide the earliest, core software for the personal computer that exploded into the most important industry in human history.
There was no “proven system.”
Had he bought hundreds of Little Caesars Pizza and Jiffy Lube franchises, this would have been credible.

Do you think those adjudicating this matter are going to be so stupid they think “reminding soldiers that have the right and duty to disobey illegal orders” and “sedition by the military” are the same thing? Seems unlikely.

Fifteen years ago, this concept held some promise, but now it’s lost its appeal to everyone but hobbyists.

If you want to make your point, chose the U.S., where homelessness has increased from 1.75 per 1,000 people in 2022 to 2.3 per 1,000 people in 2024, a 30 percent increase, and about 77 times Japan’s rate. Of course, our government doesn’t care any more about caring for our homeless population that it does about rounding up lost canaries.

He’s our savior! And just in time, too! The U.S. Constitution was approved in 1789, stipulating this law, but now Antifa wants to ensure that only registered communists may cast ballots.
You believe that, right?
This from Senior Energy Analyst Glenn Doty:
One commenter said: “Why are our scientists scaring us like this?”
What do you think is more likely: a) a team of scientists actually said this, or b) some jackass who writes clickbait claims that “scientists” have made these findings?

If:
The area of this Tesla’s roof is 2 square meters (being generous),
The efficiency of the panels is 25%,
The capacity factor of solar (depending on your location) is 20%,
The sun’s irradiance is 1000 watts per square meter,
The Tesla’s battery capacity is 100 KWhrs,
And we neglect the increased weight and drag of the array,
We’re talking about 100 hours, more than 4 days.
Doesn’t sound like a bargain, especially considering that if you overbuild the solar array on your roof and charge your car in your garage, you’ve achieved the same goal at far less expense and inconvenience.