As an extension to Faunhofer’s Center of Sustainable Development (CSE) already well established Albuquerque solar research annex, a new outdoor test field, OTF-1, will be opened to assess field performance and durability of new solar modules.

This will enable solar manufacturers to study their solar panels in greater detail, obtaining much needed experimental data, in order to meet performance standards and lifetime expectations, and eventually push them even further. Albuquerque has more than 310 sunny days on a typical year, so building the testing facility here makes good sense. (more…)

Tagged with: , , , , ,

I’ve built these before, and they easily add at least 5 MPG to any engine I have installed them on. I did another today for my son’s car. No magic here, a couple of stainless bolts, some wire, a Mason jar, a fuse and switch, water and baking soda. He’ll probably get 7 to 10 MPG, but 5 is a whole lot of fuel over a month of driving for him. But there is a deeper question here. Why? If this is so simple, and the millions of gallons of gasoline that would be saved, why is this simple device not on every single engine on the planet? This thing works on diesel engines just as well. Can anybody give me an explanation that does not sound like some ridiculous conspiracy theory? I’ve used these for years with no engine problems, and it even reduced ping on the first car I used it on, a 79 Oldsmobile. Any answers here?

Tagged with:

I urge our readers to check out this article that Glenn Doty, an extremely senior energy analyst and frequent commenter here at 2GreenEnergy, wrote on corn ethanol. Glenn asked me to respond, so here goes.

I totally agree. I’m not a fan of biofuels generally, based on the basic thermodynamics. Organisms did not evolve to store lots of chemical energy they don’t need, just so we could harvest it and put it in our gas tanks. This is why the efficiency of solar energy is orders of magnitude greater than biofuels; almost all of the sun’s energy that is absorbed by the plant goes into the organic processes required for survival and growth. 

To the degree we still have a civilization here in 100 years, I believe that the people of that day will regard our efforts at biofuels with the same mixture of pity and contempt that we have for those who treated disease with leeches and bloodletting.  Future generations will marvel: “The people of the early 21st Century lived in a time when their scientists were telling them three things: a) their population was in the process of quintupling in size to 10 billion in under 100 years, b) demands for energy were exploding far faster than the population growth alone would suggest, and c) climate change was bringing shortages of potable water and food. And they thought it would be a good idea to power their cars and trucks with their vegetables?” (more…)

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,

One of the presenters at today’s practice session for the Clean Business Investment Summit has a cool idea with respect to fire suppression, the details of which I’m sure he’d rather that I not divulge.  But that’s not the point anyway; rather it’s that he began with this blockbuster: In the United States, there have been more “megafires” (those burning more than 100,000 acres) in the last 10 years than in the 100 previous years. 

I noticed that the three (previously vocal) climate change deniers in the room were struck mute at that.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,

I serve as a “mentor” to the presenters at the Clean Business Investment Summit.  First up this morning was a portable solar PV/battery product, a concept that has merit in certain specific market segments.  Principally I think of disaster relief, movie sets, events in off-grid locations, military, etc. 

Most of the other panelists advised the presenter not to mention climate change and environmentalism, because it could “turn people off.”  I completely (but respectfully) disagreed.  Who’s going to buy this except those who see a problem with fossil fuels? The product doesn’t compete on a price/watt basis with gasoline generators.  If you’re unconcerned with sustainability, you’re not a customer here. 

I also told the young man, “The real task here is barrier to energy.  No offense, but anyone with a solar panel, an old bicycle, and a blowtorch is a potential competitor. I suggest you figure out how you can offer something that provides a unique set of benefits.  Then, make sure you brand the living hell out of it. I can help you with that.”

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One of the real opportunities for our energy future lies in the fact that many of the technologies that consume huge amounts of energy are truly ancient. I often remark how strange it is that if Thomas Edison were around today and happened to look at our motors, generators, grid, etc., he’d recognize most of it as essentially unchanged from a century ago.

And let’s keep in mind that electricity is only one of many opportunities to rethink the way we’re doing things.  I just became aware of the fact that the screw propeller that is used on almost all our power boats and ships was invented in 1827! That’s the year Chopin wrote the E minor nocturne.

I bring this up because, almost two centuries later, it appears that there has been a breakthrough in shipbuilding. Frequent commenter Tim Kingston just sent me this site on the Gamma Propulsion System, which claims to reduce energy consumption in these marine environments by 35%. That’s huge, considering the enormity of the fuel consumption in this space.

 

 

Tagged with: , , , , , , ,

Here’s a group that takes an interesting approach to sustainability: the Germany-based Borderstep Institute. Their mission:

Through scientific and applied research, the Borderstep Institute contributes to future-oriented solutions and innovations that are economically successful, supportive to climate protection and the conservation of natural resources, and embody the societal responsibility of economic actors.

One of its key players, Dr. Severin Beucker, co-founder of the institute, has asked to interview me some time next month, to get my take on green investment opportunities. (more…)

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,

A colleague just asked me if I had seen this article in Forbes.com, whose point is that, since climate change affects businesses, businesses would be wise to cut climate-changing emissions.

I wrote back:

No I hadn’t seen that. It’s pretty good.

What would make it excellent, you ask? (more…)

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,

There’s a lot to like about micro-wind leader WindStream and its radical approach to small, efficient, highly durable wind turbines that are easy to install on any rooftop.  But there’s only one thing you really need to know at this point: we’re talking about a product that is amazingly inexpensive.  July’s webinar features Dan Bates, CEO of WindStream, a company whose total rethinking of micro-wind has resulted in a product that is so affordable that virtually everyone can lessen his/her environmental impact — not to mention the utility bill.

Don’t miss this one!  Tuesday, July 31st, 10 AM PDT (1 PM EDT)

Learn more and sign up here

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,

We’ve had discussions recently on the amount of subsidies that the fossil fuel industries receive from the federal government here in the U.S. To be sure, there is a great deal of hanky-panky played with these numbers. Let me go out on a limb here and suggest that the accounting method and total number that one chooses is often a function of the case one’s trying to make.

Normally, I simply say that it doesn’t matter; any amount is too much. After all, why on Earth would we want to provide incentive to promote damage to our ecosystems, weaknesses to our national security, lung disease, etc., especially when the subject industry is already the most profitable one on the planet?

But when I read a comment from “Pierre” earlier today: “How much is the ‘polluter not paying’ subsidy worth?” it started me thinking about this. This is a brilliant point, in that there are a ton of subsidies that this whole discussion normally sidesteps:

• The cost of the wars fought to maintain access to oil (more…)

Tagged with: , , , , ,