Obama and Romney Sidestep Energy
A friend writes:
Is it only my imagination, or did Obama fail to defend body blows on clean energy last night? I thought he gave a horrible performance on energy issues! Very, very weak. Are you planning to comment on your blog?
Yes, it was discouraging.
Part of me excuses Obama because, 24 X 7, he’s actively managing the most important single entity on the planet. His opponent, admittedly a smart guy, can spend all his waking hours sharpening his tongue. But regardless, Romney did a terrific job. My congratulations to a master in his craft.
The other part of me suggests that Obama, whose expressed energy policy is “all of the above,” (i.e., that we need to pursue clean coal, gas, nuclear, and renewables in all their forms) really deserved exactly what he got. His lack of clarity and leadership in a critical time makes his position only slightly less ludicrous than Romney’s.
It’s a symptom of the political zeitgeist, based squarely on Big Money, where real integrity is pretty-much entirely absent.
As you know, I applaud Obama for having rescued the U.S. from the “drill baby drill” mentality that he inherited from his predecessor (whose name is no longer used in polite company — nor any other, as far as I can discern). But the state of our current political discourse has most certainly sunk to a new low.
In the period that precedes each election Tuesday, the Ghost of Democracy Past is paraded out in front of us in an effort to convince us that We the People have some legitimate participation in our government. On cue, the ghost returns silent to its grave each election Wednesday, at which point we go back to living under the brutal pounding of the will of the aforementioned Big Money.
Sorry, but it’s hard to take this theater too seriously.