Biofuels — The World Energy Scene Put Into Perspective
Here’s an article on biofuels, the first part of which everyone should read, as it frames the world energy situation very nicely. Yes, we face a situation in which our planet’s energy demand will double in the next 40 years, and fossil fuels will soon prove insufficient (not to mention their externalities in terms of ecological and health-related consequences). The author points out the silliness of the debate about drilling for oil on federal lands in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). “If you drilled the provable oil reserve in the entire federal ANWR and flooded the world market with it – the reserve would be used up in 9 days, at 2050 consumption rates.”
So it appears that we’re off to a good start here; the premise seems solid. I’m not sure how you get from there to the conclusion, however. The point of the article is that our focus on renewables and energy storage is misguided and that any or all of the 15 biofuels companies it names are here to save the day. The first four are “headed for commercialization now” and the other 11 are “farther down the road.”
I’m rooting for you guys, but I’m skeptical.
Life forms evolved over four billion years to convert sunlight into chemical energy that would support the organisms’ survival, growth and reproduction, not to store it in great abundance beyond the foreseeable need, so that we could come along and put it in our gas tanks. Converting solar energy in the form of biomass to chemical energy in liquid fuels can be done, as we’ve all seen, but by its very nature, it’s extremely inefficient, and thus, resource-intensive. I believe this is the reason that, after decades and billions of dollars in R&D, there are no demonstrations of commercially viable approaches in this space. Are there really some that are “headed for commercialization now?” Could be. But I’ve been hearing that for a long, long time.