Optimism / Pessimism on the Future of Renewable Energy

(more…)

(more…)
As we progress into the future, there is no question that technology is becoming more and more integrated into our everyday lives. And though we may be quick to discern growing technology with quicker and more efficient means of human productivity, the reliance that modern society places on such advancements has, without a doubt, casted unimaginable burdens within our ecological systems. (more…)

Hi Craig,
My name is Cameron Von St. James and I wanted to reach out to you to share something very special to me. I noticed your blog has a focus on the environment and living green and I was wondering if you’d be willing to help me with a very important cause! (more…)
A friend sent me this story about his local (Philadelphia) region: “Offshore Wind Farm Rejected in New Jersey.” Rightfully, he’s dismayed.
The analysis here shows how flawed our whole approach is to providing energy to businesses and consumers. The whole thing needs to be ripped out by the roots, and replaced by an energy policy at the federal level (we have none at all now) that points in the direction we as a nation want to take, and contains a few main tenets:

If only 0.02% of the sun’s energy that actually reaches planet earth is tapped, it would be enough to suffice the energy demands of the world. The sooner we put to maximum use this free gift, the faster we will make this world a better place to live.
I know many of you share my concerns about the vast damage being inflicted to human health and the environment by coal-fired power plants. You’ll be happy to learn that, at least, in the U.S., this lethal and archaic form of energy is under a great deal of pressure, and a significant number of coal plants are slated for decommission in the near future, as illustrated in this map.
A fellow EV-advocate argues that electric transportation is beneficial to the environment in the U.S. right this minute, based on the EPA’s calculator, according to which he believes that switching to an EV has “lowered his CO2 footprint by four tons per year,” and that his “experience is shared by thousands of EV/PHEV drivers around the country.”
I respond:
Sorry to say, but what you and thousands of others *think* you are doing, versus what is actually happening, are two different things. That calculator, and almost all of which I’ve seen like it, bases its mathematics on the average grid-mix in the U.S., only a bit north of 30% of which is coal.
Is it just me, or has the quality of judgment of the venture capital community experienced major slippage lately? Obviously there are the extremely visible failures like Fisker Automotive and Solyndra (yes, both were also backed with public dollars). But here’s a little beauty you may have missed: “Outbox.”
The premise: It’s easier for people to process email than snail mail, so this new business will employ people to drive around in cars to customers’ physical mail-boxes, open all the mail, scan it, and email it to the customer.
The result: Bankruptcy.
As I’ve mentioned, I receive several new clean energy business concepts per week, mostly rooted in proven technology. The scientific mechanisms behind solar, wind, biomass, hydrokinetics and geothermal are all very well-established, and have been for a great period of time. Every day there are improvements, and in some cases, important ones, and that’s a good thing. But with each email I open from an inventor somewhere on the globe, I’m constantly hoping that I’ll get something legitimate but really new – not just a claim at an incremental improvement on an old technology.
Like most people, I judge the legacies of civilization’s finest contributors to the arts and sciences by how far advanced their contributions were from the work of their predecessors. Here’s a quick story on the subject:
