Bone Dry Out Here



1) Won’t our efforts to migrate away from fossil fuels hurt our economy? I explained that this is complex. Certainly paying more for energy is a drag on the economy, as it adds costs to businesses, and leaves consumers with less disposable income. But there are other important considerations: (more…)




But it’s hard to imagine how this can be cost-effective, even at scale, given the extremely low efficiency with which plants convert radiant energy from the sun to excess chemical energy, available for us to consume. Plants evolved to maximize their own survival, not so we could harvest them and use large amounts of extra energy to fly our jets. It is for this reason that I support efforts like WindFuels, which use large amounts of off-peak energy and point sources of CO2 to synthesize carbon-neutral gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel.

What is certain, however, is that the development of technology began in earnest about 400 years ago and hasn’t (and won’t) let up. I mention this only to celebrate the birthday of Sir Francis Bacon (1561), who, according to the Writers Almanac: (more…)

Unfortunately, this type of behavior is to be expected; there is no reason to think that Washington has the least interest in serving the will of the people, who, according to this report from US News, overwhelming support a rapid migration away from fossil fuels in the direction of renewable energy.
Earlier today, a friend from the U.K sent me a business plan on a bold new idea in sustainability. It’s a clever attempt to use the strengths of media in our pop culture to forward a unified voice from “We the People” to the effect that we’re all concerned about the fate of humankind, and that we need to come together to develop and implement solutions to the challenges that stand in the way of a viable future. (more…)
