Coming Soon from Toshiba: Consumer Energy Storage Device



Whilst Spain has been a strong driving force for the CSP industry worldwide with more than 20 years’ experience in research and technology developments, the government support is what have made the development of this technology extremely lucrative in the country. But the approval in 2011 of a royal decree temporarily suspending all economic incentives for renewable sources, has shaken the CSP industry to the core.
Furthermore, the global economic downturn and the lower prices of PV and natural gas have not made 2012 an easy year for the Concentrated Solar Thermal industry worldwide. But despite the challenging times and the need for the sector to re-define its strategy to become a true contender in the global energy generation mix, the opportunities continue to flourish around the globe.
I’d like to think that last sentence is true, i.e., that CSP opportunities are, in fact, flourishing around the globe. The first part of the blurb is most certainly true: these last years have been tough for the industry. Unfortunately, the unchallenged leader in CSP development is Spain, and the European financial mess has hit them hard.
In my estimation, it will be a terrific tragedy for our civilization if CSP does not receive the opportunity that solar PV and wind did: several decades of R&D that resulted in terrific breakthroughs – particularly in cost.

I took the occasion to ask about India’s intent in building up its navy. “Oh, they’ll tell you it’s about Pakistan, but long-term it’s clearly about China.”
“But China and India aren’t enemies, are they?” I asked. (more…)

One of the more interesting features of the day was a guest who referred me to a white paper from San Francisco–based venture capital firm DBL Investors, the executive summary of which is subtitled: “Cleantech may mean debate in Washington, but it means jobs everywhere else.”

I’m sure most people regard these hijinks as good, clean collegiate fun, and so I’m sorry to sound like a kill-joy, but I find it sickening. Taking an innocent kid and teaching her that some other equally innocent kid is some sort of “enemy” merely by virtue of the school she’s chosen is deplorable. That the urban gangs do garbage like this is regrettable, but at least their members have the excuse of having been deprived of the privileges of a normal upbringing. Seeing this played out in our great academic institutions shows a revolting lack of grace and class.
The Earth is populated with races, religious sects, and nation-states that are in a perpetual state of hostility. Is it really so hard to understand why?

There was also a marvelous exhibit heralding some of the great American inventors: Franklin, Edison, The Wright Brothers, Carver, Ford, as well as dozens of others: the guy who invented the yoyo, another who gave us Post-it notes, etc. I felt a bit sad that the designers felt the need to limit the focus to Americans, but outside of that, they did a good job.
Now I’m on the train back from Los Angeles, sitting next to a very affable lady of Indian descent who works as an environmental engineer, whose job functions include a great deal of permitting and regulation. So far, the conversation’s been quite thought-provoking. “We regulate businesses, but we educate people,” she says. “As a society, we expect people to make the right decisions with respect to the environment, but not to the extent that they cease to enjoy their lives. I’m not an eco-Nazi,” she smiles.

So it appears that we’re off to a good start here; the premise seems solid. I’m not sure how you get from there to the conclusion, however. The point of the article is that our focus on renewables and energy storage is misguided and that any or all of the 15 biofuels companies it names are here to save the day. The first four are “headed for commercialization now” and the other 11 are “farther down the road.”
I’m rooting for you guys, but I’m skeptical.
Life forms evolved over four billion years to convert sunlight into chemical energy that would support the organisms’ survival, growth and reproduction, not to store it in great abundance beyond the foreseeable need, so that we could come along and put it in our gas tanks. Converting solar energy in the form of biomass to chemical energy in liquid fuels can be done, as we’ve all seen, but by its very nature, it’s extremely inefficient, and thus, resource-intensive. I believe this is the reason that, after decades and billions of dollars in R&D, there are no demonstrations of commercially viable approaches in this space. Are there really some that are “headed for commercialization now?” Could be. But I’ve been hearing that for a long, long time.

I’m reminded of the people who object to solar energy in the deserts of the U.S. southwest on the basis that it displaces certain reptiles, or those who object to wind turbines on the basis that they’re ugly. I’m not happy about the plight of those reptiles, and I too would rather behold the pristine beauty of the prairies, but not at the expense of coal-fired power plants that, each day, drive our planet closer to the point at which it will no longer support life.
For what it’s worth, this is why Bill McKibben’s recent book is called “Eaarth.” It’s a one-word reminder that we will never again live on a planet that is unadulterated by human activity. There are PCBs in the arctic. Our blood systems contain over 140 different synthetic chemicals. To the Agricultural Defense Coalition, and anyone else who wishes for a return to anything remotely resembling “purity,” I point out that train left the station 50 – 75 years ago.
We are in a world of hurt if we can’t realize, as a civilization, that we’re going to have to make certain sacrifices. Let’s get to that realization as a culture, then work together to make the right ones.

There is no doubt that Nigeria, where 98% of the people are incredibly poor, and do, in fact, cook this way, represents a huge opportunity to improve the eco-friendliness of the average kilowatt-hour of energy generated and consumed. Currently, their energy comes almost exclusively from burning hydrocarbons, with no emission controls whatsoever. In fact, this is one of the points I made in my concept of “hitting the broad side of the energy barn.”
But, as I told him, I’m not a big fan of biofuel. It’s one thing to put numbers on paper and make certain projections; in the real world, however, it becomes far more expensive than most people realize, and it tends to have horrific unintended environmental consequences. I went on to say that I’m hoping to see Africa develop renewable energy in distributed, off-grid/micro-grid settings.
But I’m wondering if this is the equivalent of saying, “Let them eat cake.” Am I being short-sighted here?