A reader comments: Unless Taylor Swift is paying for your gas and groceries, you shouldn’t care who(m) she endorses. Nor should you care who(m) any celebrity endorses. They are not keeping my lights on, my kids safe or my family fed. No one cares who(m) you endorse. You live in fantasy land. Your job is to entertain me. Stay in your lane.
We’ve all heard this argument, though ironically, it usually comes from free speech advocates, who generally are loath to tell anyone what they can and cannot say.
I’m a progressive, but I’m OK with celebrities who support Donald Trump expressing their political viewpoints. If you’re Kid Rock, Kayne West, or Elon Musk, go for it.
I remain impressed with Voltaire’s statement (attribution disputed), “I may disagree with what you say, though I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
One might think that all Americans, even the most profoundly uneducated part of Trump’s base, would have some level of respect for the opinions of our country’s top admirals and generals.
Yet that doesn’t seem to be the case. I know plenty of people who served, and many of them all Trumpers.
If it weren’t an obnoxious question, I’d love to ask why they’re not swayed by the viewpoints of the people at the very top of the armed forces.
In November, tens of millions of people will go to the polls and vote for Trump, and plenty of them will agree with Stephen King in that the former president is a “genuinely nasty man.”
The most pathetic part of this is that these voters think that Trump, in all his nastiness, is exactly what this country needs. Sure, he’s a pathological liar, a conman, and a career criminal, but he’s “making American great again.”
As shown at left, a reader wants my input on the word “cringy.”
Elements of language like these are constantly changing. I’ve never hear of “cringy,” but it wouldn’t upset me to hear my young daughter use it. Even “cringworthy” itself is only a decade or so old.
I just hope she doesn’t say, “I should have went….”
Question: Primatologist Jane Goodall asserts three reasons for her optimism about the ultimate disposition of our planet’s health. One is shown at left, i.e., all we need to do is stop poisoning and otherwise harming our Earth, and it will repair itself.
If you’ve followed our work, you know how we feel about Coca-Cola‘s sustainability claims (if you don’t, watch our video “EXPOSED: The Truth Behind Coca-Cola’s Advertising,” which we linked in our bio.)
And it’s not just us. The Coca-Cola Company is now facing a lawsuit challenging its sustainability claims. The suit alleges that Coca-Cola’s advertising misled consumers by portraying the company as environmentally friendly while continuing to be one of the largest plastic polluters globally. This legal battle highlights the much-needed growing scrutiny of corporate #Greenwashing and the need for genuine accountability.
Let’s not believe the greenwashing. Keep pushing for companies to commit to real change.
The chart here predicts continued use of fossil fuels in our transportation sector for the foreseeable future.
Personally, I doubt, it. And that’s not because humankind is likely to have some sort of epiphany, a kumbaya moment, re: ceasing to bake the planet. Rather, it’s that the extraction, refinement, distribution and sale of decreasing volumes of petroleum will not be economically feasible.