Coca Cola: Master Greenwasher
From the Story of Stuff:
From the Story of Stuff:

Personally, I doubt, it. And that’s not because humankind is likely to have some sort of epiphany, a kumbaya moment, re: ceasing to bake the planet. Rather, it’s that the extraction, refinement, distribution and sale of decreasing volumes of petroleum will not be economically feasible.

Before the Trump era, I would have said that ignorance on this level was confined to a small fraction, perhaps 10% of the voter base. The last decade has shown me how pathetically wrong I was.

I suppose the issue is: How bad are these so-called “bad times?”
I’m as interested in learning as the next guy, but I don’t really want to find out what world fascism or global environmental collapse looks like.

Yet many serious problems with that idea were about to come forward, all centered around greed and private companies’ unwillingness to police themselves. Whether the issue was deregulated banking, auto safety, environmental ruination, drug ineffectiveness and undisclosed side-effects, or, in this case, food safety, the answer was becoming clear: industry players would do anything in order to profit at consumers’ expense.
Project 2025 will eviscerate government regulation across dozens of business sectors and expand Big Money’s ability to capitalize on the misery of the common person.

The former president has given the worst people in our country permission to show us how truly reprehensible they are.

This is an example of something we encounter frequently: how we make nouns from adjectives and vice versa. The rule seems to be: make the word as short as possible. If the adjective came from a noun, and you want a noun, just go back to the noun from which the adjective came in the first place.
Some of these are obvious, like comfortability, which, while it is a word in the dictionary, shouldn’t be used, IMO. Other obvious examples are beauty rather than beautifulness, courtesy rather than courteousness, and candor rather than candidness.
Some are more subtle, e.g., grace rather than graciousness.

If you favor the democratic notion of “one vote to one person,” then, to be sure, this is wrong. The ballots of voters in small states count several times more than those cast in large states. For instance, the ratio of electoral votes to total population in Wyoming is 3.7 times greater than that ratio in California.
On the other hand, if you’re a Republican operative who wants to favor “fly-over” states, then the electoral college fits your agenda very, very well.

Again, this is Texas, so he’s probably correct.