Smart Water
As they say, “If you’re buying Smart Water, it isn’t working.”
Now, are cans better for the environment than plastic bottles? Yes, largely because they are far more likely (more than twice as likely) to be recycled.
Having said that, the best solution for eco-responsible people who wish to stay hydrated is refilling reusable containers with filtered watered. A reverse osmosis system will set you back about $200, and will cost in its lifetime of operation perhaps one one-thousandth of buying water at your local grocery store.
Save money and make the planet a better place for all life forms to live. It’s a win-win, though it’s not a “win-win-win,” insofar as the purveyors of bottled (or canned) water will lose. But does anyone care about the well-being of those whose business model is cajoling consumers and destroying our home?
Some folks think that this guy, with his blatant disregard for honesty, not to mention public safety, should be a heartbeat away from the U.S. presidency.
It would be interesting to know what percentage of U.S. voters are in synch with the meme here.
When Fox News agreed to pay $787 million to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting systems, one might have thought that the good old days of deliberate lying on the air had come to a close.
It’s been a while since I mentioned that Pope Francis is a fabulous humanitarian.
A reader sent me this, which was interesting because I was having the same thought.
The meme here came from a reader.
Which is a more effective tool for an absolute ruler to maintain power: force or deception?
The meme here comes from a reader. Two comments:
