Physics Is Very Unlikely to Achieve a Complete Understanding of the Universe

Science remains thirsty for new discoveries, and we should not expect anyone of any stature in this arena to tell us that they have physics entirely “in the can.”

Science remains thirsty for new discoveries, and we should not expect anyone of any stature in this arena to tell us that they have physics entirely “in the can.”

Unfortunately for them, there is something wrong with committing crimes, felonies, to be more specific. One would think that this would be obvious, but evidently not.

Yet keep in mind that those working to weaken public education couldn’t care less about some notion of “community.” Whether these people are Christian fundamentalists, or some other form of small-government zealot, they have no real interest in anything that resembles inclusion or “oneness.”
In fact, they want to see the opposite: a hatred, or at least resentment of immigrants, the poor, the Spanish-speaking, Muslims, gays, etc.


Admittedly, Northern Europe has many positive geographic and demographic features: a strong supply of renewable energy resources, high gas prices, short driving distances, and, most importantly, a citizenry that honestly cares about sustainability, i.e., one that has a sincere interest in leaving behind a planet that fully supports life as we’ve come to know it.
By way of comparison, sales of new EVs in the U.S. run at about 6.5%.

Who doesn’t love Betty White? “If men could get pregnant, abortions would be available at Jiffy Lube.”

The point is that, while things like covering large land masses with solar and wind farms may be practical, they lack the sex appeal of things like fusion, which offers what is essentially an infinite supply of energy in perpetuity.
The problem, of course, is that, where solar and wind are here now, fusion is likely at least a decade, probably several, in the future.
Looking at geoengineering, I suppose there are people who find the subject to be sexy. Maybe these are BDSM enthusiasts; I just find the topic to be frightening. Making wholesale and irreversible changes in the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere, and dealing with an eternity of unintended consequences, doesn’t turn me on.

In fact, the reason that reasonable people trust science is that we’re aware that we lack the time and resources to conduct this research ourselves: formulating hypotheses, experiment design and execution, analysis of results, drawing conclusions, publishing findings, and having them peer reviewed.
Shortly after I entered the field of climate science and interviewed Dr. V. Ramanathan at the Scripps Institute, one of the world’s leading experts on the subject, a well-meaning guy suggested that I come to my own independent conclusions on the subject. I respectfully pointed out that “Ram” (as he likes to be called, is one of tens of thousands of people who have made it their lifework to study this subject, each of which has a serious head start over me, including several decades of work, uncountable terabytes of data, and billions of dollars of surveillance equipment on and above the Earth.
I’m equally unqualified to “do my own research” in disease control, anthropology, molecular biology, and quantum physics.
If a few crackpots think this renders me intellectually deficient or gullible, I’ll have to learn to live with that.

Calling this “theological heresy,” on the other hand, seems unnecessarily nasty. Lots of Americans need this belief in their lives as if it’s oxygen. Let’s simply get used to living around these folks with tolerance and acceptance.
Yet, it’s interesting to think about what it would be like if there were less irrationality in the U.S. electorate. For instance, what level of support would there be for Donald Trump with his 91 felony counts if American voters were intelligent and reasonable people?

I have always wanted to do my part, all other things equal, to make our world a better, more just and inclusive place to live.
The notion that our civilization is falling apart because of anticapitalist wokeism is appealing to a relatively small group of hateful white supremacist idiots, but to a very few people beyond those limits.