Why Trump’s Appeals to U.S. Supreme Court re: Immunity from Prosecution Will Fail

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who was randomly assigned to the federal criminal case accusing Donald Trump of conspiring to illegally overturn the 2020 election, has ruled that “presidents are not kings,” and therefore Trump had no special privilege to commit crimes with impunity.
Now, special prosecutor Jack Smith has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to make a ruling here, even though such a request “leap-frogs” the case over an appellate court.
Former federal prosecutor and legal analysts Glenn Kirscher makes a point that, IMO, explains why Trump’s assertion is, in fact, absurd: If the Supreme Court agrees with Trump, they are making the statement that they are not a co-equal branch of government as specified in the U.S. Constitution. If Trump were to be reelected, he could, if he wished, simply disband the high court.
This is the type of political criminality that defines so-called “banana republics,” i.e., these countries’ executives somehow attain absolute power, and then wield that power to pound their judiciaries and legislative bodies (not to mention political opponents) into insignificance. Regardless of how conservative the nine-judge panel may be, they will not vote to set aside the Constitution so as to catapult Donald Trump to a position of leadership enjoyed by Kim Jong Un and the world’s other sociopathic dictators.

From a reader, apparently anxious to show off his ignorance of world affairs.
This from Richard Stengel, author, political analyst, and former Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs in the Obama administration.
I encourage readers to check out the
Quite a few of the people I grew up with in the suburbs of Philadelphia have turned out to be Trump supporters and conspiracy theorists; the meme here came from one of them.
Here’s another reminder of how remarkable it is that Trump has any support from women at all.
C.S. Lewis is remembered as a gifted writer who touched the hearts of young and old alike. To those of you who didn’t have the pleasure and honor of reading “The Chronicles of Narnia” with your child, only to have the both of you bawling like babies at the end, I’d have to say that you might have missed something.
Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson makes a pointed observation here, but I wonder how true it is.
This from former U.S. labor secretary Robert Reich.
I agree with what Oscar Wilde said here, and I freely admit that it fully applies to me.