Contrasting Views on Easter from Two Political Leaders
At left we have a statement, which, though it may not have set the world on fire, was sent by a sane and decent human being.
Contrast that with what we have below, from a man whose principal claim to fame is now roundly regarded as the “Big Lie.”
The good news is that Trump is as likely to come back into human civilization as the bubonic plague. His support is eroding, and that’s even before we have indictments for the stolen documents, January 6th, and the election tampering in Georgia.
I’m not saying that this country is finished with its bout with hateful ignorance and lunacy, but we’re very close to ridding ourselves of the orange sociopath.
U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice 
This is true for all of us at some level, but it seems to be especially pronounced in right-wing U.S. politics since the emergence of Donald Trump on the scene in 2015.
Aristotle wrote a great deal on the subject of when to discontinue a friendship, or, in other words, where loyalty must be withdrawn.
Earlier, I wrote a post based on a conversation with a conservative friend who bemoaned the fact that Republicans are having difficulty establishing a message that resonates with American voters.
Given the harsh realities of climate change, it’s beginning to look like what Asimov said here about the threat to humanity is exactly correct.
Here’s a “Let’s Go Brandon” flag at half-staff. Kinda funny, I must admit.
If there is any precise language that the judge handed down that governs what Trump may and may not say about his upcoming criminal trial for fraud/obstruction, it’s not on public display. However, using common sense, we can surmise that anything that threatens violence against the DA, his family, or the judge himself will mean that Trump is held in contempt, presumably to be immediately remanded into custody at Rikers Island.
Translation: Is it still possible to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees C (above pre-industrial times)? This is what recent scientific data says.
