Prosecuting Trump



Yes, this is a “civilizational wake-up call,” but we seem to be continually hitting the snooze button on the alarm.
I’m reminded of the cartoon featuring a dazed-looking fellow crawling out of a time machine and telling his friend, “I went into the future to warn them, but they said they already knew and didn’t care.”

As we’ve all learned over the past six or seven years, we live among tens of millions of amazingly stupid people. And for this reason, the criminal prosecution of the 45th president is going to cause a great deal of commotion among heavily armed morons.
It needs to be said, however, that rule of law, i.e., the concept that no one is above the law, requires that an attempt to overthrow the government of the United States must not be ignored if American democracy is to survive.

One hopes that investigation in the January 6th insurrection and the larger coup attempt is an example of this. (more…)

Part of the national angst is that, with each passing day, the DoJ is either getting closer to unsealing a set of indictments against Trump and his cronies for seditious conspiracy and treason….or that prospect is getting further away.
We all carry with us the dread of knowing that if justice does not prevail in this case, the United States will essentially disappear from the face of the Earth as a democratic republic.

Richard Rohr is an American Franciscan priest and writer on spirituality based in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He was ordained to the priesthood in the Roman Catholic Church in 1970. In 2011 PBS called him “one of the most popular spirituality authors and speakers in the world.”
Good point to be made here. Just because a group of people accepts Jesus Christ as their Lord and savior doesn’t necessitate that they live their lives according to His teachings
This is what gave rise to Gandhi’s remarkable quote: “I love your Christ, not so your Christians.”

What he says here is worth noting, given the close brush we just had with the demotion of law and the retrogression into authoritarianism.

I honestly can’t think of a single thing that makes this at all credible. Air travel has to be safe, and closely monitored by government agencies. Even if the cost of fuel can be reduced, as is the claim, this will have very little effect on the overall cost per passenger.
This is akin to the piece I published about a month ago on the company that is developing personalized single person aircraft that it claims will replace automobile commuting to and from work. In other words, the skies will soon be filled with tens of millions of little airplanes piloted by people with 30-minutes’ virtual reality training and no pilot’s license. If that seems feasible, I’m not sure what to tell you.

FWIW, I’ve never been able to understand people’s enmity to organized labor. Management’s job is to squeeze workers; unions enable workers to push back. Seems only fair to me.

Unfortunately, the fossil fuel industry, ExxonMobil in particular, is against the idea, so it has no more chance of passing than a law protecting our children from assault weapons.
Big Money wins. Exceptions are few.