Tag: nuclear renaissance

Here’s an article that makes the same point that I have put forth a few dozen times: there is no nuclear renaissance.  At the core of the discussion is the simple and unavoidable fact that nuclear is fantastically expensive – even …

The "Nuclear Renaissance" Was Cancelled Read More »

Tagged with: ,

A reader asked that I comment on this fairly euphoric piece, suggesting that the world economy can and will be revived with the aggressive adoption of electric transportation and photovoltaics. Here are a few bits and pieces of my reaction. …

Electric Transportation and Solar Energy Read More »

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

M. Mayer writes a longer comment from which I excerpt: Judging the risks (associated with a certain energy technology) is hard because it’s about making guesses about the unknown. … In a way it’s easier to predict that the sun …

Nuclear Energy Faces Considerable Risk Read More »

Tagged with: , , ,

Because there are plenty of people writing on the Fukushima disaster, I tend to comment on it quite sparingly. But I just received an email from Areva (the French nuclear giant) that begins: “With the nuclear renaissance pushing ahead, I’m …

The Nuclear Renaissance is Pushing Ahead? Really? Read More »

Tagged with: , , ,

Guest Blogger Mike Brace comments on an article called “A nuclear renaissance needs government funding to move ahead.” This is full-on garbage, written in a deliberate attempt to mislead readers. If you want to find it, use Google, as I …

Nuclear Renaissance? Guest Blogger Mike Brace Says "Let's Hope Not." Read More »

Tagged with: