It’s Widely Agreed that Trump Is Revolting–Time to Get Him Out

He needs to be removed. Now.

He needs to be removed. Now.

Needless to say, I’ve heard this a great many times over the years. The subject is a bit complex.
While it’s true that nuclear offers far better energy density than solar (and wind), this is one of many criteria we use to determine the best resource(s). We might rank our presidents on the basis of how few wars the Unites States was fighting during their tenure in office, yet there are dozens of other important criteria: economic strength, lessening the gaps between rich and poor, etc.
Another way to look at this subject is to look at competing resources in a certain region. The central part of the U.S. has incredible wind resources; a normal day in the Nebraska grid-mix offers 70% wind.
If human civilization is to avoid environmental collapse driven by climate change, nuclear is going to be absolutely necessary, but only partially due to energy density; nuclear boasts high reliability and capacity factor, as well as low operating expenses.
In all, the world needs to hope that nuclear advances quickly; we won’t do well without it.
Thanks for the comment.

Here’s a piece from the Brennan School of Justice at New York University Law School:
Debunking the Voter Fraud Myth
Sensationalist claims have circulated this election season about the extent of voter fraud, with some politicians going so far as to tell voters to fear that this November’s election will be “rigged.”
Because electoral integrity is one of the elements necessary to making America the greatest democracy in the world, claims like this garner media attention, and frighten and concern voters. But putting rhetoric aside to look at the facts makes clear that fraud by voters at the polls is vanishingly rare, and does not happen on a scale even close to that necessary to “rig” an election.
Studies Agree: Impersonation Fraud by Voters Very Rarely Happens
The Brennan Center’s seminal report on this issue, The Truth About Voter Fraud, found that most
reported incidents of voter fraud are actually traceable to other sources, such as clerical errors or
bad data matching practices. The report reviewed elections that had been meticulously studied for
voter fraud, and found incident rates between 0.0003 percent and 0.0025 percent. Given this tiny
incident rate for voter impersonation fraud, it is more likely, the report noted, that an American
“will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls.”
A study published by a Columbia University political scientist tracked incidence rates for voter
fraud for two years, and found that the rare fraud that was reported generally could be traced to
“false claims by the loser of a close race, mischief and administrative or voter error.”
When I moved from Washington D.C. to California in 1982, I got a new drivers license, then used it to register to vote. I’ve voted every two years since, and no one has asked me to show my ID.

Convicted felon (x34)
Adjudicated rapist
Insurrection instigator
Traitor – Insurgent against U.S. federal government

But what’s that compared to his strengths in terms of fanning the flames of racial hate, and all his other fine abilities?

What about the people? A) You’ve never met any of them, and B) Their business plan calls for attracting randos from social media.

The other, of course, is his relentless drive to acquire ever more wealth and power, so as to make it impossible for the United States to have a free and fair election in 2028.

“Why do you think they all did this exact thing?” he asked us.
One of us said, “Because they think they can get out.”
Mr. Tokeida smiled and asked my classmate in response, “So you’re attributing a meal worm with the ability to think?”
I was stunned; I hadn’t seen this coming. Here was an introduction to philosophy that hit me like a ton of bricks. There must be some mechanism that drove the meal worms to follow the rim, but it couldn’t properly be called “thinking,” could it?
There is an analogy to a recent monologue that Bill Maher did, aimed at Trump supporters, asking them to consider what “America” actually means in terms of rule of law, due process, no-one above the law, and the U.S. Constitution. He concluded: “What good is Making America Great Again if you wind up losing the ‘America’ part?”
When I heard this, I traveled back to sixth grade, and I asked myself: are we over-attributing the capacity to think to these people?

It’s a representation of how preposterous all this is.
Comments on Word Usage in Modern Times
1) The word “their” in the sentence “Each student (singular) should bring their (plural) book,” is a workaround for “Each student should bring his or her book.” Since the latter is clumsy, I prefer, “Each student should bring his book.” This is sexist, of course (why not “her?”) Yet, I think this is the best option.
2) “Ain’t” is most definitely a real word; it’s slang for “isn’t,” and should be used in appropriate settings, e.g., “Farmer Bob said, ‘My corn crop ain’t what it was last year.'”
3) I see no reason that emoji/emojis should be treated differently than any other noun.
4) Misusing “literally” like this merely shows one’s ignorance. I know it’s common among young undereducated people, and I’m sure it works in conversations with their peers. I can assure you that it wouldn’t work at all in job interviews for med-law school, Deloitte, Boston Consulting, etc.
5) “Impactful” is a legitimate word, and I can’t understand why some people (pedants?) are critical of its use.