Governments are throwing billions at smart-grid development. Industry giants from IT, transportation, and communications are jockeying to dominate what will be a complete transformation of electric utilities.
The world is in the process of migrating from a one-way communication , i.e., flow of electricity from the utility to the customer, to two-way communication, where the billions of devices that use electrical power communicate back to the utility. And the benefits will be magnificent: saving energy, lowering cost, increasing reliability, and ultimately enabling electric transportation and better penetration of renewable energy.
Normally, when I write about such things, it’s to enable readers to understand the issues surrounding how things will work, as well as when and why it will happen. Here, it’s for a different purpose, to let you know how you can profit from it. My colleague Bill Paul has been successfully prognosticating stock market ups and downs for more than 20 years. As a staff writer for the Wall Street Journal, and as a commentator on CNBC, he’s earned the respect of investors around the globe.
If you’re interested to know how you can pick the right horses in the incredible steeplechase in smart-grid, mark you calendar and join us for a free webinar, Thursday, June 17, at 10:00 AM PDT (1:00 PM EDT), in which Bill will be “grilled” by a few people – including me – and you, if you’d like to participate.
In this segment of the 2GreenEnergy Report, Plug-In America’s Paul Scott speaks with me on one of my favorite subjects: the Electric Vehicle Adoption Curve. Readers may have noticed that I’ve try to get at this subject “eight ways from Sunday,” and I thought Paul added some terrific insight. See if you agree.
I’d be remiss if I didn’t note with sadness the passing of John Wooden. Coach Wooden will stand forever as a personification of strength of character and integrity, and his examples will never be forgotten.
When I sat down to write this, I feared that it may be construed as off-topic, but I soon realized that it isn’t at all. The man showed us all a rare courage that helps inspire us in our quest for a just and sustainable world.
I few years ago I wrote a couple of short pieces on another blog regarding my experiences coaching kids’ sports and I mentioned Coach Wooden by name in the process:
I hope you take advantage of the opportunity to coach. Not only is it fun and rewarding for you, but you’re making an enormous contribution to others. I know I’m not John Wooden, but I also know that most of these kids I’ve coached in soccer and basketball will remember this experience for the rest of their lives. I’m profoundly grateful for the chance to have helped.
“Fun and frivolity are usually the first casualties of a recession, and so are the vehicles that let the good times roll,” says Lawrence Ulrich of MSN Autos. “Buyers, all buyers, have become much more practical,” said Jeff Schuster, an industry forecaster for JD Powers and Associates. “They look at cars like these and say, ‘I just can’t swing that right now.'” Consequently, the sporty side of the luxury car market is in a sales free fall.
Now does this corroborate my views on the impending paradigm shift in driving? Readers may recall that I boldly (foolishly?) predict that American drivers are soon to lose the identity “I am what I drive” as the realization kicks in that “To some degree, what I drive harms me and everyone around me.”
I can’t predict the exact tipping point, but I’ll be stunned if drivers 20 years are still looking to a big piece of chrome and steel with a chic hood ornament as a way to broadcast their affluence. This, as a sociological phenomenon, is on it way out.
Like hydrogen as a fuel, liquid ammonia is a carrier of energy, as opposed to a source of energy. When we create ammonia out of nitrogen and hydrogen, we add energy to form a compound that can later be broken down, releasing some of that energy for useful purposes at a time and place of our choosing.
In that sense, ammonia is like compressed air or batteries: you can only take out the energy you had put in earlier. As a substance, this is constrated against gasoline and other fossil fuels, the chemical energy in which was created by our sun long ago. (more…)
I figured that my posts on Renewable Energy World on liquid ammonia would eventually get some response. I had been wondered how it could be possible that so few people were working on projects in this area, as it really does seem like an important idea. In particular, as a liquid energy storage medium, it has the potential to solve three tough problems simultaneously. In addition to being clean, safe, reliable, and scaleable, liquid ammonia can help in:
1) Moving large amounts of energy around a large land mass (like the lower 48 states) in a way that would compete with electrical. (Proponents point out that a great deal of this piping infrastructure is already in place.) (more…)
Following up on yesterday’s post about how investors should be prepared for BP to file for bankruptcy, the company’s CEO this morning reportedly said it’s “hard to speculate” on future dividend policy. That’s tantamount to BP’s saying it will reduce or eliminate its dividend. I’ll say it again: look for BP to file for court protection before the end of summer.
Many of my friends have asked my opinion on the likely impact of the Gulf oil spill on the trajectory for renewable energy. And although one might think that I’d be in a reasonably good position to answer a question like that directly and accurately, in truth, it really is hard for me –- or anyone, I believe — to predict the effect of this catastrophe on the world’s energy policy going forward. I offer a few points for discussion:
Many people suggest that, as horrific as the spill is, it comes with a “silver lining,” i.e., accelerating the demand for a replacement for oil as our predominant energy supply, brought about by an increased awareness of the many dangers of oil. Oh really? So the general public — normally fast asleep — has awakened? So a large flock of sheep had an epiphany on the dangers of oil and created a firestorm of outrage at the oil companies? So what? The same political forces that have continued to grant oil companies enormous subsidies through the last half century and made gasoline/diesel 98+% of our transportation fuel – even when we became aware of the dangers many decades ago — are still in place. And now those forces are working harder than ever. Do you think the corporate powers and (by far) the biggest lobby on the planet are updating their résumés and looking for new careers because of a lousy oil spill?
In addition to the big politics and big money, there legitimately are technology issues. Of course, these issues would have been largely mitigated, or eliminated entirely, if we had done what we should have been doing since the oil embargoes of the 1970s: running 1000 miles per hour toward electric transportation and various forms of renewables. Now, our oil addiction is so severe that the consequences of moving away from it are, like withdrawing from any addiction, quite unpleasant.
And consider global climate change. Some people say that the oil spill negates any point that the “deniers” may have had — i.e., now the validity of the global climate change theory no longer matters. Of course, that’s been the case for a long time as well. If you’re looking for a reason to break our oil addiction, the argument about global warming has been moot for many years; it’s been obvious to most of us that there are five or six different equally compelling reasons. I know there are people who disbelieve the climate change theory; I run into them all the time. But are there people who don’t believe in terrorism? In the consequences of a ballooning national debt? In lung cancer? In the dangers of weak national security? In ocean acidification? The spill is certain to weaken the position of the oil zealots (and whatever forces control them) — who try so hard to sell us on the idea that “oil business as usual” is a reasonable path towards a sustainable civilization.
So I suppose that there really is a silver lining here. It is precisely that now, anyone and everyone (you don’t have to be a clean energy editor/business analyst) can see the truth for what it is. There is one and only one winner in oil, namely the oil companies themselves. Recall the tobacco companies of the 20th Century, and their product — the only legal one that when used as directed causes death. At a certain point we all realized that cigarettes were very good for Philip Morris investors and executives – but that they were very bad for literally everyone else on the Earth. The issue is the same here. The oil companies are the sole beneficiary of oil. And now, finally, it’s clear to everyone.
Let’s acknowledge that we made a grievous mistake in the 1970s/1980s — and move on. And let’s keep our eye on the ball this time. Dropping the ball once is not license to drop it again. Use this as a litmus test for our leaders: an elected official who is really on your side (if there actually is such a thing) will take whatever political risks may come his way to stay the course in the development of clean energy solutions.
But it’s up to you and me to insist that our leaders do that. In case you haven’t noticed, they don’t do things because they’re right; they do them because they’re forced.
Paul Scott, co-founder of Plug-in America, speaks with 2GreenEnergy Report host Craig Shields about electric transportation and charging infrastructure.