An old friend from college called this morning to alert me to this documentary on climate change called “Chasing Ice.” Apparently it’s quite artsy; it won an award at the Sundance Film Festival.
I’m sometimes invited to screenings of works like this before they’re released; I’m sure hoping that will be the case here.
Congratulations to Aedan Kernan (2GreenEnergy contributor) and our other friends in the UK. Your fine country received top honors in terms of energy efficiency rankings — #1 out of the 12 nations considered.
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), a Washington DC-based non-profit just published its first-ever International Energy Efficiency Scorecard. The report places the U.S. 9th on the list and notes: “(the U.S. has made) limited or little progress toward greater efficiency at the national level.”
As long as Americans can have electricity at 11 cents per kWh and there’s lots of cold beer at the grocery store, the sad truth is that the bulk of us really don’t care. The issue, of course, is that, when one adds in the externalities of generating that electricity, the costs are huge – to every living thing on the planet.
It’s the birthday of Gregor Mendel, whose famous experiments with pea plants in 1854 led to his theory of genetics. But, according to The Writer’s Almanac, when Mendel died in 1888, his papers were burned, and it wasn’t until the 1920s that scientists recognized the significance of Mendel’s work.
That certainly makes one wonder about the ideas we may have floating around us today, doesn’t it? As I’m fond of saying, if we still have a civilization here in a few decades, we will have conquered this energy problem; I’m quite certain that we will not be burning coal in 2050. There are, however, many open questions, among which are:
• Exactly what technologies will scale to win the day?
• Who will make a buck in the process?
• How much ecological damage will we have done by that time?
I put quite a few miles on my car today between meetings, which gave me a while to catch up on the news. One of the top stories of the day was Syria and the world’s concern that its chemical weapons might fall into the hands of “irresponsible parties.” I broke out into laughter when I heard this; in fact, I was glad that I was alone in the car so that I did not embarrass myself. Is there a responsible use of chemical weapons?
You may have noticed our series of posts we call “Take a Cool Guess,” in which we offer one-question quizzes on cleantech trivia. I hope you’ve had fun with them; I know I have.
In a recent “Take a Cool Guess” post I mentioned Falcon Waterless, a new client for whom my team and I will be doing a bit of content creation. Those of you following this now know that the amount of clean drinking water (an increasingly rare and precious commodity) flushed down the average urinal in the United States is (more…)
Being green can be a time-consuming task and no one should have to do it alone! Whether you’re wanting to work in a more environmentally concerned industry, make like-minded friends, rub shoulders with influential figures or simply buy fresh local produce, New York City offers nearly unlimited opportunities to live a green life. (more…)
44 years ago today, Robert E. Moore and Robert Noyce founded Intel. Today, Moore is probably best known for the “law” that bears his name, the concept that the effectiveness of technology expands exponentially through time.
Speaking of which, a friend of a friend put me in touch with futurist Ray Kurzweil, who happens to be a big fan of this concept. In fact, Kurzweil requested that I review this presentation on Moore’s Law in advance of an interview for my next book: Renewable Energy — Following the Money. I found it interesting, and I hope you will too. It certainly does give us hope.
Here’s a good article by Robert Rapier, an extremely senior journalist in the energy industry. He and I had a nice chat on cellulosic ethanol a few years ago, and I have a great deal of respect for him. Having said that, I think he’s on the wrong side of a few issues here.
Robert takes exception to the concept that, regarding climate change, “The science is settled.” He writes: (It) is just not a statement that I am comfortable with, and I am uncomfortable labeling those who question climate change with something that evokes comparisons with Holocaust denial….. Not all skeptics are idiots. But not all proponents are well-informed…”
I agree in principle. I don’t have a problem with good, honest skepticism. But that’s not the way this is playing itself out in the real world (more…)
It’s becoming increasingly important for new cars to be eco-friendly. Lowered emissions, better mileage, and the adaptation of existing diesel and petrol engines to include hybrid electric motors and batteries is becoming more of a focus for manufacturers as they seek compliance with low pollution regulations. In this context, some of the best new cars from leading marques are being designed to combine the best of power, handling and options for lowered emissions. Some of the best examples of this eco friendly trend, in no particular order, include: (more…)
Here’s something I’ve shared with a number of people but, for some reason, have not yet posted. It’s called Secret Worlds: The Universe Within, and offers the opportunity to take a journey from the cosmos:
10 million light years from the Earth, through space towards the Earth in successive orders of magnitude until you reach a tall oak tree just outside the buildings of the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Tallahassee, Florida. After that, begin to move from the actual size of a leaf into a microscopic world that reveals leaf cell walls, the cell nucleus, chromatin, DNA and finally, into the subatomic universe of electrons and protons.
I often use this website as a way to communicate the challenge associated with a “unified theory of everything.” We want one set of understandable principles that apply equally to galaxies (which are 20 – 25 orders of magnitude larger than our familiar world of ballpoint pens and automobiles), as well as to the tiniest building blocks of the universe, perhaps infinitesimally small vibrating strings of energy (that are 20 – 25 orders of magnitude smaller than these everyday objects in our lives).
Taking this journey, for me at least, underscores the audacity of supposing that this unified theory exists at all. And if it does exist, is the human intellect, even that of the Stephen Hawkings of the world, up to the task of apprehending it?
I’m reminded of a quote from British-born geneticist and evolutionary biologist John Burdon Sanderson Haldane: “The universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.”
Enjoy.
