Clean Energy, Job Creation, and the US Supreme Court

Having said that, I’m starting to make some rough guesses as to what direction this project will ultimately take. (more…)

Having said that, I’m starting to make some rough guesses as to what direction this project will ultimately take. (more…)

But I do want to continue to call readers’ attention to material on the subject that I consider to be professionalially constructed and compelling. On such item was co-written by Erik Conway, a gentleman whose work is chronicling the history of JPL (which, coincidentally, I can see from my back patio from my home here just northwest of Pasadena, CA). You may want to check out Merchants of Doubt, an exposé of the group of rightwing scientists hell-bent on destroying the cause of environmentalism.
Here’s another blog post on the legacy of Hermann Scheer, German Parliamentarian and clean energy hero, who died unexpectedly yesterday.
Americans used 4.5% less energy during 2009 than they did in 2008, while wind power generation jumped a dramatic 37.25% last year, according to a recent report released by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Natural gas use declined, while solar, hydro and geothermal power all recorded gains. US carbon dioxide emissions from energy consumption fell 7% from 2008 to 2009, according to the annual energy review of the Energy Information Administration.
But let’s not get too excited.



In response to my request to Dr. Robert Pollin, from the Department of Economics and Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst:
Per the voice message I just left for you, I’m working on a follow up to my first book, Renewable Energy – Facts and Fantasies, which was a fairly general survey of the subject of clean energy: I’d like this one to focus on the macro-economic implications, particularly job creation. Do you suppose I could interview you?
Dr. Pollin writes:
Of course I would be happy to speak to you. Great idea for a book. This week is pretty booked already but next week is more open. Let’s find a decent time.
Not only is the guy super-qualified, but I really like his enthusism! Looks like a bulls-eye.

4010 Ocean Ranch
Oceanside, CA 92056
760-477-2300
Their website is out-of-date; I’ve encouraged them to get their act together there.
Bill Gates gave the concept of Feed-in tariffs a bit of a battering during his recent publicity drive to promote energy R&D funding.
Feed-in tariffs have given renewable energy companies a major boost in countries such as Germany and Spain. But Gates believes the money could have been better spent: “The world has spent a massive amount of money which, in terms of creating both jobs and knowledge, would have been far better spent on energy research,” he claims.
Gates firmly believes that R&D is the only viable solution and R&D will not be properly funded without government action. He sees a need for what he calls ‘miracles’ to reduce our CO2 emissions. Reductions of 20 per cent in CO2 output won’t cut it.
“There is absolutely no hope if you just say the world should use less energy. The only hope is less CO2 per unit of energy.” There is no existing technology that at anywhere near economic levels gives us electricity with zero CO2.”

I included people from Grist, Greenpeace, Mother Nature Network, World Wildlife Fund, and the United Nations’ Environmental Programme,. On the list are Tom Lovejoy from the H. John Heinz III Center for Economics and Science, Ken Cook from Environmental Working Group, Frances Beineke from the Natural Resources Defense Council, Robert Redford and the League of Conservation Voters, Andrew Revkin at Dot Earth/NY Times, Lester R. Brown of the Earth Policy Institute, and other folks like Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart, and Thomas Friedman.
If anyone has other good suggestions, please let me know.