Are Electric Vehicles Fire Hazards?

I interviewed Rick as the basis for a chapter of my first book, “Renewable Energy–Facts and Fantasies,” as an example of what forward-thinking cities are capable of when it comes to phasing out petroleum. I conducted the talk on a walking tour of his facility, which features huge tanks of different types of fuel, during which I asked, jokingly, “Am I in any personal danger here this afternoon?”
Taking me seriously, Rick replied that gas-powered vehicles are far more likely to catch fire than EVs and the rest. In fact, there are so many explosions of traditional cars each day that most of them don’t even make the local news.
Here we are 15 years later, and now we’re starting to see the propaganda that falsely claims that EVs are extremely likely to burst into flames, an assertion refuted in this recent article in AutoBlog. This stuff is composed by people who have no moral issues with blatant dishonesty.

Wow.
If there is one good thing about the MAGA cult, it’s that these people are not trying to slip by unnoticed.
As we go through the waning days of 2023 and into what could be called “The Year of the 91 Felonies,” here (at left) is the message the former president wants to convey.
The author of the cartoon here conflates “capacity for critical thinking” and the “training to conduct scientific research,” even though they are two different things.
There is no doubt that the author of the meme here has identified a problem with our food system, though I would argue that it’s not the problem.
Political pundits everywhere are struggling to understand how it’s possible that Biden, given his administration’s admirable performance across a wide range of metrics, has such a lackluster approval rating.
In an earlier post,
A few incorrect (though fairly unimportant) claims in the meme here:
From his home in Buckinghamshire, England, my colleague Gary Tulie (pictured) writes: