A. J. Shaka, professor of Chemistry at the University of California at Irvine writes: I dislike CCS (carbon capture and sequestration) because, to me, it seems like a bait and switch to rationalize continued use of fossil fuels.
I’m with you. We’re so close to weaning ourselves from our last-millennium energy sources that it seems ludicrous to be even thinking about huge investments just to keep them around a bit longer. Doesn’t everyone have a sense that this is true?
Frequent commenter and renewables DIYer extraordinaire Brian McGowan writes: I know you like CSP (Concentrated Solar Power). Here is an interesting system. If only they would just use the steam to turn turbines instead of getting oil out of the ground.
Yes, it’s a shame that we’re still focused on oil, but EOR (enhanced oil recovery) will be a reality for some time to come, so it’s better done with renewable energy than with fossil fuels.
We’re living through a time of great change. Here’s one way to look at it: (more…)
Yes, this is what they’re talking about doing at Stanford University as well.
Keep in mind that providing a 5 KM range in 10 seconds (at 1.2 KW/KM, even assuming 100% efficiency) requires charging with 2 MW of electrical power (!). Personally, I won’t want to be in the same zip code as that bus when this is taking place. But maybe that’s just me.
Regarding the webinar I did on Advanced Rail Energy Storage (ARES), Matthew Graham writes: This is the best idea for grid level storage I have seen. Why such little publicity? This is so simple and beautiful you would think it would have a much more vocal following.
I doubt it’s a coincidence, and I’m not sure “tribute” is the right word. As they say: imitation is the sincerest form of theft. Seriously, that really is a good article, and she’s got all this stuff right on target…
The transition from the warmer summer months to the cooler fall months is a great time to start thinking about your home’s energy efficiency. If you are ready to save some extra money and cut down on your family’s carbon footprint, then take a look at these five tips for improving the energy efficiency of your own home.
2GreenEnergy supporter Gary Tulie writes: Here is an article on the effects of climate change at various levels of temperature rise. It makes disturbing reading. Some of the research indicates that positive feedback will kick in above 2 centigrade of temperature rise meaning that temperature may continue to rise – eventually by 5 or 6 centigrade before a new equilibrium can be achieved, and that level of temperature rise is not a pretty sight.(more…)
• You, Mr. or Ms. Reader, are part of the reason #1 and #2 happened, and you should take credit for it. You care about the quality of our planet, and you endeavor to save it. You live in a world where the actions of its people still matter, and that’s probably the best news of all.
Those keeping track of the development of hydrokinetics (including tidal, ocean current, wave energy, etc.) will be interested to know that the U.S. Department of Energy is shelling out $7.4 million to encourage R&D in this space.
As long as we’re talking about seven figures, it’s hard to imagine that any taxpayer could be too upset; for example, that figure is about 1/100,000th of the military budget. Having said that, this is a good example of a certain consequence of the maturity and scale of solar PV and wind energy, i.e., that is tends to make other clean energy technologies noncompetitive.