From Guest Blogger Jenny Richards: Shift into A Green Drive with Eco-Cars



Here’s the bad news: their current plan is to approach Jim Inhofe’s (R-OK) staff, and set up a round of presentations on the subject. (more…)

I respond:
Thanks; this is interesting. However, from the standpoint of energy and the Brazilian economy, I would be thinking as follows:
• Hydroelectricity doesn’t really compete with the availability of potable water. This is largely true of hydroelectric dams, and it’s even more clear in the case of run-of-river hydro, where a portion of a river’s water is redirected temporarily, and then allowed to rejoin the main flow almost immediately.
• The southern part of the country seems to have plenty of water, and that’s where almost all the energy demand is.
• Now, obviously, if the government is essentially anti-business and the entire economy is going to hell in a hand-basket, energy demand will fall, as will prices, providing a significant challenge to developers of energy generation projects. However, many observers don’t seem convinced that this is truly the case.


In that vein, here’s a letter that appeared recently in a Canadian newspaper about the Obama presidency more generally. Something to consider.

The bottom line here is that the fossil fuel industry has, in effect, lost the battle. The exact time of its demise can be debated, but it’s certainly far closer than most people imagine. The issue, of course, is the concept of the “Tipping Point” that author Malcolm Gladwell popularized in his 2007 best-seller of that title. As you look through the graphics in the article linked above, try to imagine the scale we’re talking about here: enormous volumes of manufacturing capacity that are growing at a compound annual growth rate of 66%.

There seem to be two main theories: a) it’s going into melting part of the enormous volume of Arctic ice, and b) it’s warming the oceans. Here’s an article/graphic on the latter concept that I received earlier today from an extremely senior scientist in this arena, Dr. Alexander Cannara.

I think I like CSP because there’s a sense of stately power to it… It’s an obelisk – an ancient symbol of power shining brightly, the tip visible for a hundred miles. It’s a testament. We built something… It’s kind of the same feeling that I have about the Grand Coulee Dam (pictured), or the Empire State Building.
I found it funny for this to come from such a man of science—but he certainly has a good point to make here. I’m reminded of the conversations I had with solar historian John Perlin, in which he explained that there are people who are unimpressed with PV because it lacks a certain masculinity: it doesn’t feature molten metal, crunching gears or pounding pistons. It just sits there; it doesn’t even get hot!
Here’s a topic that’s gotten a fair amount of play over the years: solar (PV) roads. Finally, the first such thoroughfare is open to the public—in the Netherlands: land of tulips, windmills, and yes, if you get far enough off the beaten track over there, you will find people wearing wooden shoes.
As I’ve mentioned before, I can’t imagine that this represents a cost-effective way to lay down PV. Even the number one thing to like here, i.e., land use, isn’t really the bonanza that it seems, due to shadows. A shadow the size of a pack of matches on a 15-square-foot panel will knock over one-third of its power out.
I have a feeling this is of symbolic value only.

My friend is an advocate of solar thermal (aka, concentrated solar power/CSP). My personal concern is that its levelized cost of energy cannot approach that of solar PV and wind, and that, therefore, it may be doomed to obscurity.
Not everyone sees it that way, however. Here’s good news from the people running the huge (377 MW) Ivanpah facility in Eastern California.