Robert Rapier on the Use of Data



To attempt an answer, I would say that, unless your religion requires you to choose one or the other, the world seems to have been made in such a way to be completely indifferent to what human beings do on it, to and for one another.
The collection of extreme wealth and power by a very few amoral people suggests that, regardless of what kind and intelligent people may have preferred, we are moving through a century that features slowly growing oligarchy and environmental ruin.
I offer this not as a prediction of gloom but rather as a challenge to us all.

Wrong on both accounts. (more…)
When I came across this meme on India’s roadways, I wrote: “Does this represent a legitimate path to sustainability, via a new use of waste plastic?”

What do they think will happen if they succeed in making the entirety of the US transition to electric cars? (more…)

Clarence Thomas voted to block evidence of his wife’s criminality. Please don’t tell me we need a “binding code of ethics” to cover something so obviously illegal and corrupt.
The Due Process clauses of the United States Constitution require (emphasis mine) judges to recuse themselves from cases in which there is a strong possibility that the judge’s decision will be biased.
Do we need a new law that makes it illegal to kill someone with a spear-gun? Of course not. The deliberate and unlawful killing of another person is always called “murder.”

There is one more tiny little issue facing the GOP, that just might be on the minds of a few, and that’s
The evidence is growing on a daily basis that the 45th president and his team attempted to overturn the 2020 election, thus overthrowing the U.S. government. True Americans are not onboard for this.
On a discussion of the merits of EVs, Reader A notes: