Is Our Demagogue-in-Chief Nearing the End of His Career?



As discussed here, green hydrogen, or hydrogen created from electrolyzing water with low-carbon power, will likely be an important component of our energy mix as we enter the middle part of the 21st Century.
True, the processes by which hydrogen is made and consumed (through fuel cells) have low efficiencies; in total, only about half of the energy going in is ultimately available for use. But hydrogen is portable, making it ideal for the transportation sector that consists of large, heavy vehicles: ocean-going cargo ships, aircraft, and Class 8 trucks.
Storing energy in batteries and discharging them through motors is a far more efficient undertaking, but will battery technology improve to the point it becomes feasible for these purposes, and hydrogen becomes obsolete? It’s possible, but it’s good to know that hydrogen represents a solid solution if required.

This underscores the importance of the upcoming election. Note how many of these atrocities are currently held up in court. If Trump is removed in November, most of the damage he intended to wreak will never actually happen; if he is re-elected, the cost will be incalculable, and the destruction, in many cases, irreparable.

There are several factors that may contribute here:
• Poor people know how far a few extra dollars go. (more…)

If you want to argue about the validity of endless wars or the chasm between rich and poor, go for it. But please don’t claim Christ would have supported the torture of 70,000 children, hundreds of them under four years old.

First, there is a difference between liking or disliking what someone is saying and blocking the proliferation of harmful lies. Suppose you want to express the completely baseless claim that Joe Biden traffics cocaine and little boys. Go for it, if you’re prepared to deal with the resultant slander cases that may result.
But can you expect that all media institutions, that may have standards about truth, have the obligation to publish and help you disseminate that? Does the First Amendment force electronic or print media sources to publish your bull****?
No, it doesn’t.

If you respond, “Well, you’re not going to get more energy out of this than you put into it, you have what it takes to graduate into junior high school.

This excluded the amoral rich. Most rich people know that Trump is terrible for the country and the world at large, but he’s fabulous for them personally, and they couldn’t care less about anyone but themselves.
They make huge campaign contributions in exchange for tax breaks, and those gifts are worth every nickel.

It’s from the Years Project, whose mission is “to compel measurable and effective action on climate change through trusted storytelling across all media.” And damn, they’re good at it.